Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
92
out 100
VS
73
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra Manufactured in May, 2025, with display 14 with chipsetXiaomi Xring O1, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro, Manufactured in September, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
- Larger display: 14in
- Higher pixel density: 275ppi
- Lighter design: 609g vs 610g
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 14 in | 12.1 in |
| Resolution | 2136x3200 pixels | 1600x2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 275 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92 % | 83.5 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 305.82 mm (12.04 in) | 279.8 mm (11.02 in) |
| Width | 207.47 mm (8.17 in) | 181.7 mm (7.15 in) |
| Thickness | 5.1 mm (0.2 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 609 g (21.48 oz) | 610 g (21.52 oz) |
| Area | 634 cm² (98.27 in²) | 508 cm² (78.74 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue |
- Silver - Gray - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Xiaomi Xring O1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 3900 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A520) - 2/1.9 (Cortex-A725) - 4/3.4 (Cortex-A725) - 2/3.9 (Cortex-X925) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)) - 1/2.7 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU Cores | 2048 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1392 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2737 | 1210 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 9191 | 3325 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 20977 | n/a |
| CPU | 658893 | 290548 |
| GPU | 1069048 | 298705 |
| Memory | 552710 | 185452 |
| UX | 386023 | 161215 |
| NanoReview Score | 2666674 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 12000 mAh | 12000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 120 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/4 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 17 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" | 1/5.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.61 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | n/a | 2 |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2025 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 120 W | Yes, 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
