Xiaomi Pad 7 vs Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
80
out 100
VS
70
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pad 7 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 11.2 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3, vs Huawei MatePad 11.5 S, Manufactured in May, 2024with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9000WL. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 7
- Higher pixel density: 344ppi
- Lighter design: 500g vs 510g
- Higher battery capacity: 8850mAh vs 8800mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.0
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
- Larger display: 11.5in
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11.2 in | 11.5 in |
| Resolution | 2136x3200 pixels | 1840x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 344 ppi | 291 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7 % | 85.1 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 97.4 % |
| Response time | n/a | 23 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 516:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 in) | 261 mm (10.28 in) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 in) | 177.2 mm (6.98 in) |
| Thickness | 6.18 mm (0.24 in) | 6.2 mm (0.24 in) |
| Weight | 500 g (17.64 oz) | 510 g (17.99 oz) |
| Area | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) | 462 cm² (71.61 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green |
- Silver - Gray - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 | HiSilicon Kirin 9000WL |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2490 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | n/a |
| Architecture | - 3/1.9 (Cortex-A520) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/2.8 (Cortex-X4) |
n/a |
| Process | TSMC | n/a |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | n/a |
| Neural Processor | Yes | n/a |
| Graphics | Adreno 732 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 768 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 1459.2 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1904 | 1241 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5081 | 3882 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 2591 |
| CPU | 360403 | 213665 |
| GPU | 471479 | n/a |
| Memory | 307567 | 148262 |
| UX | 233591 | 148835 |
| NanoReview Score | 1373040 | 510762 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | n/a |
| Memory Card | n/a | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | HarmonyOS 4.2 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 8850 mAh | 8800 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 225 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:20 h | 2:00 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | n/a | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | n/a | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | n/a | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.0 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 300 | 399 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 45 W | Yes 22 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 7 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 5
