Xiaomi Pad 7 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
80
out 100
VS
61
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pad 7 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 11.2 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite, Manufactured in August, 2025with chipsetSamsung Exynos 1380. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 7
- Larger display: 11.2in
- Higher pixel density: 344ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 500g vs 524g
- Higher battery capacity: 8850mAh vs 8000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11.2 in | 10.9 in |
| Resolution | 2136x3200 pixels | 1320x2112 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 344 ppi | 228 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7 % | 81.7 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 in) | 254.3 mm (10.01 in) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 in) | 165.8 mm (6.53 in) |
| Thickness | 6.18 mm (0.24 in) | 6.5 mm (0.26 in) |
| Weight | 500 g (17.64 oz) | 524 g (18.48 oz) |
| Area | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) | 422 cm² (65.41 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green |
- Silver - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3/1.9 (Cortex-A520) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/2.8 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 732 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 160 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 949 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1459.2 GFLOPS | 303.7 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1904 | 1011 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5081 | 2951 |
| CPU | 360403 | 197333 |
| GPU | 471479 | 168831 |
| Memory | 307567 | 113518 |
| UX | 233591 | 144132 |
| NanoReview Score | 1373040 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | n/a | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | One UI 7.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 8850 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 25 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:20 h | 2:00 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | n/a | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | n/a |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | n/a | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | n/a | 1 |
| SIM Type | No | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 300 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 45 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 7 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
