Home Tablet comparison Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 and Honor Pad X7 - Which is better?

Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 vs Honor Pad X7

87 out 100
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
VS
53 out 100
Honor Pad X7
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
Honor Pad X7

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 Manufactured in June, 2025, with display 12.5 with chipsetXiaomi Xring O1, vs Honor Pad X7, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
  • Larger display: 12.5in
  • Higher pixel density: 308ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 10610mAh vs 7020mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port
  • Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Honor Pad X7
  • Lighter design: 365g vs 576g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 n/a

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 and Honor Pad X7
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
vs
Honor Pad X7

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 12.5 in 8.7 in
Resolution 2136x3200 pixels 800x1340 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 5:3
Pixel density 308 ppi 179 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes n/a
Max brightness 1000 nits 625 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10 No
Touch Sampling Rate 240 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 86.8 % 81.5 %
Features DCI-P3 n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 279.1 mm (10.99 in) 211.8 mm (8.34 in)
Width 192 mm (7.56 in) 124.8 mm (4.91 in)
Thickness 5.8 mm (0.23 in) 7.99 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 576 g (20.32 oz) 365 g (12.87 oz)
Area 536 cm² (83.08 in²) 264 cm² (40.92 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Black
- Silver
- Gray
- Purple		 Gray
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button No
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
86.8 %
Honor Pad X7
81.5 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 and Honor Pad X7 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Xiaomi Xring O1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Max Frequency 3400 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU Cores 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A520)
- 2/1.9 (Cortex-A725)
- 4/3.4 (Cortex-A725)
- 2/3.9 (Cortex-X925)		 - 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53))
- 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73))
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 6 nm
Neural Processor Yes Hexagon 686
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 n/a
GPU Cores 2048 n/a
GPU Frequency 1392 MHz n/a
FLOPS 5701.6 GFLOPS n/a
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
2645
Honor Pad X7
407
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
8528
Honor Pad X7
1309
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2645407
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)85281309
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5], [Honor Pad X7]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
n/a
Honor Pad X7
2817990
CPU538809849957
GPU940944978432
Memory472337398278
UX353177591323
NanoReview Scoren/a2817990

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 4800 MHz n/a
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.1n/a
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 15 Android 15
UI Skin HyperOS 2.0 n/a

Battery

Volume 10610 mAh 7020 mAh
Max Charging Power 120 W 10 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes No
Fast Charging Yes No

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 8 MP
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features Bokeh effect
Main lens
Matrix50 MP8 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/2.0
SensorSamsung S5KJN1n/a
Sensor size1/2.76"n/a
Pixel size0.64 μmn/a
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 5 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Sensor Omnivision OV32D n/a
Sensor size 1/3.6" n/a
Pixel size 0.61 μm n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
NFC* No No
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM TypeNoNo
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid Slotn/aNo
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 6.0 n/a
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a No

Other

Class Flagship Budget
Announced June, 2025 yr July, 2025 yr
Release Date June, 2025 yr July, 2025 yr
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 Accelerometer
Charger Included Yes 120 W Yes, 10 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below