Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
92
out 100
VS
75
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Manufactured in May, 2025, with display 11.2 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon Elite, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1, Manufactured in November, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 344ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 485g vs 610g
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher battery capacity: 12000mAh vs 9200mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.2 in | 12.1 in |
| Resolution | 2136x3200 pixels | 1600x2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 344 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7 % | 83.5 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 in) | 279.8 mm (11.02 in) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 in) | 181.65 mm (7.15 in) |
| Thickness | 5.75 mm (0.23 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 485 g (17.11 oz) | 610 g (21.52 oz) |
| Area | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) | 508 cm² (78.74 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Green |
- Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 4320 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)) - 1/2.7 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 895 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS | 458.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 3180 | 1229 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 9610 | 3197 |
| CPU | 525838 | 306232 |
| GPU | 1106299 | 327665 |
| Memory | 486155 | 213580 |
| UX | 452918 | 229615 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5300 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 3 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 9200 mAh | 12000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes (20% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:30 h | 3:00 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 17 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6 | 1/5.0 (0.2) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | November, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2025 yr | November, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes, 67 W | Yes, 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
