Home Tablet comparison Xiaomi Poco Pad and Infinix Xpad 20 - Which is better?

Xiaomi Poco Pad vs Infinix Xpad 20

69 out 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad
VS
52 out 100
Infinix Xpad 20
Xiaomi Poco Pad
Infinix Xpad 20

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco Pad Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 12.1 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, vs Infinix Xpad 20, Manufactured in June, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G88. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad
  • Larger display: 12.1in
  • Higher pixel density: 249ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 7000mAh
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Infinix Xpad 20
  • Lighter design: 498g vs 571g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB		 - 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Poco Pad and Infinix Xpad 20
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
Xiaomi Poco Pad
vs
Infinix Xpad 20

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 12.1 in 11 in
Resolution 1600x2560 pixels 1200x1920 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
Pixel density 249 ppi 206 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max brightness 600 nits 440 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision No
Screen-to-body ratio 83.4 % 80.5 %
Features DCI-P3 n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 280 mm (11.02 in) 257.7 mm (10.15 in)
Width 181.85 mm (7.16 in) 169.2 mm (6.66 in)
Thickness 7.52 mm (0.3 in) 7.9 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 571 g (20.14 oz) 498 g (17.57 oz)
Area 509 cm² (78.9 in²) 436 cm² (67.58 in²)
Water resistance n/a No
Back panel Metal n/a
Frame Metal n/a
Colors - Gray
- Blue		 - Gray
- Green
- Red
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Poco Pad
83.4 %
Infinix Xpad 20
80.5 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Poco Pad and Infinix Xpad 20 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 MediaTek Helio G88
Max Frequency 2400 MHz 2000 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55)
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78)		 - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2 (Cortex-A75)
Process Samsung TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 12 nm
Neural Processor Yes MediaTek APU
Graphics Adreno 710 Mali-G52 MP2
GPU Cores 256 48
GPU Frequency 940 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS 481.3 GFLOPS 96 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Poco Pad
1020
Infinix Xpad 20
439
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Poco Pad
3012
Infinix Xpad 20
1455
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)1020439
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)30121455
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Infinix Xpad 20]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi Poco Pad
618887
Infinix Xpad 20
n/a
CPU20894988293
GPU11965240180
Memory13783176933
UX15245569361
NanoReview Score618887n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 1800 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2eMMC 5.1
Memory CardMicroSDMicroSD

Software

OS Android 14 Android 15
UI Skin HyperOS 1.0 n/a

Battery

Volume 10000 mAh 7000 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 10 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (29% in 30 min) No
Full Charge Time 2:00 h n/a

Main camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital No
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion No n/a
Lenses count Standard: 8 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features Bokeh effect
Main lens
Matrix8 MP8 MP
Aperturef/1.8n/a
Sensor size1/4.0"n/a
Pixel size1.12 μmn/a
AutofocusPhase autofocusNo
StabilizationDigitalNo

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 5 MP
Sensor CMOS n/a
Sensor size 1/4.0" n/a
Pixel size 1.12 μm n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo		 n/a
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*1n/a
SIM TypeNanoNo
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNon/a
2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900n/a
3G BandsWCDMA 1/2/5/8n/a
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B71)n/a
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 n/a
3.5 mm Jack Yes Yes
FM Radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos Yes No

Other

Class Mid-range Budget
Announced May, 2024 yr May, 2025 yr
Release Date May, 2024 yr June, 2025 yr
Sensors - Hall Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass		 Accelerometer
Charger Included Yes 33 W Yes, 10 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
2 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below