Xiaomi Poco Pad vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
69
out 100
VS
57
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco Pad Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 12.1 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus), Manufactured in October, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher pixel density: 249ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 7040mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5.1
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
- Lighter design: 480g vs 571g
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 12.1 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 1600x2560 pixels | 1200x1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 8:5 |
| Pixel density | 249 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4 % | 80.9 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 94.2 % |
| Response time | n/a | 42 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1409:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 280 mm (11.02 in) | 257.1 mm (10.12 in) |
| Width | 181.85 mm (7.16 in) | 168.7 mm (6.64 in) |
| Thickness | 7.52 mm (0.3 in) | 6.9 mm (0.27 in) |
| Weight | 571 g (20.14 oz) | 480 g (16.93 oz) |
| Area | 509 cm² (78.9 in²) | 434 cm² (67.27 in²) |
| Water resistance | n/a | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue |
- Silver - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 710 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 940 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | 481.3 GFLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1020 | 911 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3012 | 2008 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 1191 |
| CPU | 208949 | 137612 |
| GPU | 119652 | 82744 |
| Memory | 137831 | 85206 |
| UX | 152455 | 107644 |
| NanoReview Score | 618887 | 413206 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| OS Size | n/a | 22.9 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | One UI 5.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 10000 mAh | 7040 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (29% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | 2:58 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 11:00 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 14:59 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:39 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 136 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/5/8 | UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900) |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2024 yr | October, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2024 yr | October, 2023 yr |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
