Xiaomi Poco Pad vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco Pad Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 12.1 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE, Manufactured in September, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad
  • Larger display: 12.1in
  • Higher pixel density: 249ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 8000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
  • Lighter design: 478g vs 571g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Poco Pad and Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 12.1 in 11 in
Resolution 1600x2560 pixels 1200x1920 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
Pixel density 249 ppi 207 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max brightness 600 nits 400 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes HDR10
Screen-to-body ratio 83.4 % 82.2 %
Features DCI-P3 DCI-P3
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Xiaomi Poco Pad
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
400 nits
sRGB gamutn/a93.1 %
Response timen/a37 ms
Contrastn/a1689:1

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 280 mm (11.02 in) 255.53 mm (10.06 in)
Width 181.85 mm (7.16 in) 167.08 mm (6.58 in)
Thickness 7.52 mm (0.3 in) 7.36 mm (0.29 in)
Weight 571 g (20.14 oz) 478 g (16.86 oz)
Area 509 cm² (78.9 in²) 427 cm² (66.19 in²)
Water resistance n/a No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Gray
- Blue
- Gray
- Green
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Poco Pad
83.4 %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
82.2 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Poco Pad and Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Max Frequency 2400 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55)
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78)
- 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53))
- 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73))
Process Samsung TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 6 nm
Neural Processor Yes Hexagon 686
Graphics Adreno 710 Adreno 610
GPU Cores 256 128
GPU Frequency 940 MHz 1114 MHz
FLOPS 481.3 GFLOPS 284 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Poco Pad
1020
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
412
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Poco Pad
3012
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1423
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)1020412
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)30121423
Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a348
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi Poco Pad
618887
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
279216
CPU20894991109
GPU11965240869
Memory13783168964
UX15245578274
NanoReview Score618887279216
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Poco Pad
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
582
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Xiaomi Poco Pad
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
6945
Writing scoren/a9238
Web scoren/a6619
Video editingn/a3677
Data manipulationn/a5908
NanoReview Scoren/a6945

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2eMMC 5.1
Memory CardMicroSDMicroSD

Software

OS Android 14 Android 13
OS Size n/a 22 GB
UI Skin HyperOS 1.0 HyperOS 1.0

Battery

Volume 10000 mAh 8000 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 18 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (29% in 30 min) Yes (24% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 2:00 h 2:45 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Xiaomi Poco Pad
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
29:44
Web Browsingn/a10:41 h
Video Playbackn/a12:28 h
Gamesn/a06:20 h
Standby Moden/a183 h

Main camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Zoom Digital n/a
Flash LED No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion No No
Lenses count Standard: 8 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features Bokeh effect
Main lens
Matrix8 MP8 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/2.0
Sensor size1/4.0"1/4.0"
Pixel size1.12 μmn/a
AutofocusPhase autofocusNo
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 5 MP
Aperture n/a f/2.2
Sensor CMOS n/a
Sensor size 1/4.0" 1/5.0"
Pixel size 1.12 μm n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
n/a
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*1n/a
SIM TypeNanoNo
eSIM Support *Non/a
Hybrid SlotNon/a
2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900n/a
3G BandsWCDMA 1/2/5/8n/a
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B71)n/a
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack Yes Yes
FM Radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Xiaomi Poco Pad
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
88.3 dB

Other

Class Mid-range Budget
Announced May, 2024 yr August, 2023 yr
Release Date May, 2024 yr September, 2023 yr
Launch Price ($) n/a 249
Sensors - Hall Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Hall Sensor
- Accelerometer
Charger Included Yes 33 W Yes 18 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
2 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below