Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 vs Honor Pad 20
80
out 100
VS
70
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Manufactured in November, 2025, with display 11.2 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3, vs Honor Pad 20, Manufactured in May, 2026with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
- Higher pixel density: 344ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 500g vs 525g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Honor Pad 20
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher battery capacity: 10100mAh vs 8850mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.2 in | 12.1 in |
| Resolution | 2136x3200 pixels | 1872x3000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 344 ppi | 292 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | n/a | Yes |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | 700 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7 % | 85.4 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 in) | 277.1 mm (10.91 in) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 in) | 179.3 mm (7.06 in) |
| Thickness | 6.18 mm (0.24 in) | 6.3 mm (0.25 in) |
| Weight | 500 g (17.64 oz) | 525 g (18.52 oz) |
| Area | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) | 497 cm² (77.04 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue |
- Gray - Green - Pink |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2630 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3/1.9 (Cortex-A520) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/2.8 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715)) - 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 732 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 768 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 1459.2 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1873 | 1154 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5149 | 3110 |
| CPU | 365078 | 369492 |
| GPU | 467273 | 210450 |
| Memory | 309615 | 181398 |
| UX | 239702 | 281337 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 1042677 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | MagicOS 10 |
Battery
| Volume | 8850 mAh | 10100 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:20 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV13B10 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 (0.33) | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 (0.25) | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | n/a | 1 |
| SIM Type | No | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 6.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2025 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2025 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
