Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 vs Honor Pad X9a
80
out 100
VS
53
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Manufactured in November, 2025, with display 11.2 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3, vs Honor Pad X9a, Manufactured in March, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
- Higher pixel density: 344ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8850mAh vs 8300mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Honor Pad X9a
- Larger display: 11.5in
- Lighter design: 475g vs 500g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11.2 in | 11.5 in |
| Resolution | 2136x3200 pixels | 1504x2508 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 344 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | n/a | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7 % | 84.1 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 in) | 267.3 mm (10.52 in) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 in) | 167.4 mm (6.59 in) |
| Thickness | 6.18 mm (0.24 in) | 6.77 mm (0.27 in) |
| Weight | 500 g (17.64 oz) | 475 g (16.76 oz) |
| Area | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) | 447 cm² (69.29 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue |
Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3/1.9 (Cortex-A520) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/2.8 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 732 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 768 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 1459.2 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1873 | 471 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5149 | 1505 |
| CPU | 365078 | 191663 |
| GPU | 467273 | 29731 |
| Memory | 309615 | 110054 |
| UX | 239702 | 129788 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 461236 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 9118 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | MagicOS 9 |
Battery
| Volume | 8850 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:20 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV13B10 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 (0.33) | 1/5.0 (0.2) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | 2592x1944 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 (0.25) | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | November, 2025 yr | March, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2025 yr | March, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | Yes, 45 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
