Home Tablet comparison Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 and OnePlus Pad Go 2 - Which is better?

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 vs OnePlus Pad Go 2

80 out 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
VS
71 out 100
OnePlus Pad Go 2
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
OnePlus Pad Go 2

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Manufactured in November, 2025, with display 11.2 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3, vs OnePlus Pad Go 2, Manufactured in December, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
  • Higher pixel density: 344ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Lighter design: 500g vs 597g
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port
  • Includes charger
Reasons to choose OnePlus Pad Go 2
  • Larger display: 12.1in
  • Higher battery capacity: 10050mAh vs 8850mAh

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/256 GB
- 8/512 GB		 - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 and OnePlus Pad Go 2
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Tablets:
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
vs
OnePlus Pad Go 2

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 11.2 in 12.1 in
Resolution 2136x3200 pixels 1980x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 7:5
Pixel density 344 ppi 283 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate n/a Yes (30-120 Hz)
Max brightness 800 nits 900 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision No
Touch Sampling Rate 360 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 85.7 % 87.1 %
Features DCI-P3 DCI-P3

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 251.22 mm (9.89 in) 266.01 mm (10.47 in)
Width 173.42 mm (6.83 in) 192.77 mm (7.59 in)
Thickness 6.18 mm (0.24 in) 6.83 mm (0.27 in)
Weight 500 g (17.64 oz) 597 g (21.06 oz)
Area 436 cm² (67.58 in²) 513 cm² (79.52 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Gray
- Blue		 - Silver
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
85.7 %
OnePlus Pad Go 2
87.1 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 and OnePlus Pad Go 2 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
Max Frequency 2800 MHz 2500 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 4 + 3) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 3/1.9 (Cortex-A520)
- 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/2.8 (Cortex-X4)		 - 4/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 4/2.5 (Cortex-A78)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Yes MediaTek APU 655
Graphics Adreno 732 Mali-G615 MP2
GPU Cores 768 256
GPU Frequency 950 MHz 1047 MHz
FLOPS 1459.2 GFLOPS 536.1 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
1873
OnePlus Pad Go 2
1003
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
5149
OnePlus Pad Go 2
3112
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)18731003
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)51493112
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Xiaomi Poco Pad X1], [OnePlus Pad Go 2]
AnTuTu 10
CPU365078348329
GPU467273129977
Memory309615216406
UX239702316570

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency n/a 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 15 Android 16
UI Skin HyperOS 2.0 OxygenOS 16

Battery

Volume 8850 mAh 10050 mAh
Max Charging Power 45 W 33 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 30 min) Yes
Full Charge Time 1:20 h n/a

Main camera

Matrix 13 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution 4160x3120 pixels n/a
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Lenses count Standard: 13 MP Standard: 8 MP
Features
Main lens
Matrix13 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.2n/a
SensorOmnivision OV13B10n/a
Sensor size1/3.06 (0.33)n/a
Pixel size1.12 μmn/a
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Matrix 3264x2448 pixels n/a
Aperture f/2.3 n/a
Sensor Omnivision OV08D10 CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0 (0.25) n/a
Pixel size 1.12 μm n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital n/a
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
DisplayPort Yes No
NFC* Yes No
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*n/a1
SIM TypeNoNano
SIM Moden/aDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid Slotn/aNo
5G SupportNoYes

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced November, 2025 yr December, 2025 yr
Release Date November, 2025 yr December, 2025 yr
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass		 - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
Charger Included Yes, 45 W No
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below