Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 vs Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
80
out 100
VS
59
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Manufactured in November, 2025, with display 11.2 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad C1, Manufactured in May, 2026with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
- Larger display: 11.2in
- Higher pixel density: 344ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8850mAh vs 7600mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
- Lighter design: 406g vs 500g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.2 in | 9.7 in |
| Resolution | 2136x3200 pixels | 1280x2048 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 344 ppi | 268 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | n/a | Yes |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7 % | 87.9 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 in) | 226.51 mm (8.92 in) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 in) | 147.97 mm (5.83 in) |
| Thickness | 6.18 mm (0.24 in) | 7.4 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 500 g (17.64 oz) | 406 g (14.32 oz) |
| Area | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) | 335 cm² (51.93 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue |
- Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3/1.9 (Cortex-A520) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/2.8 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.9 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 732 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 768 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 1459.2 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1873 | 490 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5149 | 1512 |
| CPU | 365078 | 200538 |
| GPU | 467273 | 29602 |
| Memory | 309615 | 114287 |
| UX | 239702 | 138620 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 511632 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 8850 mAh | 7600 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:20 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV13B10 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 (0.33) | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Matrix | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 (0.25) | 1/5.0 (0.2) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | November, 2025 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2025 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
