Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Manufactured in September, 2025, with display 12.1 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7, Manufactured in November, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G88. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher pixel density: 249ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 12000mAh vs 7700mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7
- Lighter design: 505g vs 610g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 1600x2560 pixels | 1200x1900 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 249 ppi | 201 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | n/a |
| Max brightness | n/a | 420 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5 % | 83 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 279.8 mm (11.02 in) | 254.6 mm (10.02 in) |
| Width | 181.7 mm (7.15 in) | 166.1 mm (6.54 in) |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) | 7.3 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 610 g (21.52 oz) | 505 g (17.81 oz) |
| Area | 508 cm² (78.74 in²) | 423 cm² (65.57 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Purple |
- Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | MediaTek Helio G88 |
| Max Frequency | 2700 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)) - 1/2.7 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek APU |
| Graphics | Adreno 810 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1210 | 421 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3325 | 1360 |
| CPU | 290548 | 82915 |
| GPU | 298705 | 48665 |
| Memory | 185452 | 69698 |
| UX | 161215 | 72629 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | n/a |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 12000 mAh | 7700 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | n/a |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | n/a |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | n/a | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | No | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | n/a |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | September, 2025 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2025 yr | November, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 33 W | Yes, 0 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0