Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro vs Infinix Xpad 20
63
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Manufactured in April, 2024, with display 12.1 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, vs Infinix Xpad 20, Manufactured in June, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G88. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
- Larger display: 12.1in
- Higher pixel density: 249ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 7000mAh
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Infinix Xpad 20
- Lighter design: 498g vs 571g
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 1600x2560 pixels | 1200x1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 249 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | 440 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4 % | 80.5 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 94 % | n/a |
| Response time | 20 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1283:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 280 mm (11.02 in) | 257.7 mm (10.15 in) |
| Width | 181.85 mm (7.16 in) | 169.2 mm (6.66 in) |
| Thickness | 7.52 mm (0.3 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 571 g (20.14 oz) | 498 g (17.57 oz) |
| Area | 509 cm² (78.9 in²) | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) |
| Water resistance | IP52 | No |
| Back panel | Metal | n/a |
| Frame | Metal | n/a |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Green |
- Gray - Green - Red - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | MediaTek Helio G88 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek APU |
| Graphics | Adreno 710 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 940 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 481.3 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1015 | 439 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2970 | 1455 |
| CPU | 148674 | 88293 |
| GPU | 127282 | 40180 |
| Memory | 112531 | 76933 |
| UX | 147978 | 69361 |
| NanoReview Score | 536465 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 28 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 10000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (28% in 30 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 07:10 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:19 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:30 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 149 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
|
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | n/a |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | April, 2024 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2024 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
Accelerometer |
| Charger Included | No | Yes, 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 3
