Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro vs Xiaomi Poco Pad X1

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Manufactured in April, 2024, with display 12.1 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, vs Xiaomi Poco Pad X1, Manufactured in November, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
  • Larger display: 12.1in
  • Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 8850mAh
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
  • Higher pixel density: 344ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Lighter design: 500g vs 571g
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port
  • Includes charger

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 8/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro and Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 12.1 in 11.2 in
Resolution 1600x2560 pixels 2136x3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 3:2
Pixel density 249 ppi 344 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No n/a
Max brightness 600 nits 800 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 360 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 83.4 % 85.7 %
Features DCI-P3 DCI-P3
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
658 nits
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
n/a
sRGB gamut94 %n/a
Response time20 msn/a
Contrast1283:1n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 280 mm (11.02 in) 251.22 mm (9.89 in)
Width 181.85 mm (7.16 in) 173.42 mm (6.83 in)
Thickness 7.52 mm (0.3 in) 6.18 mm (0.24 in)
Weight 571 g (20.14 oz) 500 g (17.64 oz)
Area 509 cm² (78.9 in²) 436 cm² (67.58 in²)
Water resistance IP52 No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Gray
- Blue
- Green
- Gray
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
83.4 %
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
85.7 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro and Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
Max Frequency 2400 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55)
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78)
- 3/1.9 (Cortex-A520)
- 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/2.8 (Cortex-X4)
Process Samsung TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Yes Yes
Graphics Adreno 710 Adreno 732
GPU Cores 256 768
GPU Frequency 940 MHz 950 MHz
FLOPS 481.3 GFLOPS 1459.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
1015
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
1873
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
2970
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
5149
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)10151873
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)29705149
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
536465
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
n/a
CPU148674365078
GPU127282467273
Memory112531309615
UX147978239702
NanoReview Score536465n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 6 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz n/a
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 4.0
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 14 Android 15
OS Size 28 GB n/a
UI Skin HyperOS HyperOS 2.0

Battery

Volume 10000 mAh 8850 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 45 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (28% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 2:00 h 1:20 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
23:43
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
n/a
Web Browsing07:10 hn/a
Video Playback11:19 hn/a
Games05:30 hn/a
Standby Mode149 hn/a

Main camera

Matrix 8 MP 13 MP
Photo resolution n/a 4160x3120 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion No n/a
Lenses count Standard: 8 MP Standard: 13 MP
Features Bokeh effect
Main lens
Matrix8 MP13 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/2.2
Sensorn/aOmnivision OV13B10
Sensor size1/4.0"1/3.06 (0.33)
Pixel size1.12 μm1.12 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 8 MP
Matrix n/a 3264x2448 pixels
Aperture n/a f/2.3
Sensor CMOS Omnivision OV08D10
Sensor size 1/4.0" 1/4.0 (0.25)
Pixel size 1.12 μm 1.12 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
NFC* No Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*2n/a
SIM TypeNoNo
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNon/a
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
3.5 mm Jack Yes No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
82 dB
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
n/a

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced April, 2024 yr November, 2025 yr
Release Date April, 2024 yr November, 2025 yr
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
Charger Included No Yes, 45 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below