Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
50
out 100
VS
40
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 Manufactured in August, 2024, with display 8.7 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite, Manufactured in June, 2021with chipsetMediaTek Helio P22T. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6650mAh vs 5100mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
- Lighter design: 366g vs 373g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 8.7 in | 8.7 in |
| Resolution | 800x1340 pixels | 800x1340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 179 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | 350 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.2 % | 81.3 % |
| sRGB gamut | 82.8 % | 83.4 % |
| Response time | 43 ms | 40 ms |
| Contrast | 1349:1 | 1500:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 211.58 mm (8.33 in) | 212.5 mm (8.37 in) |
| Width | 125.48 mm (4.94 in) | 124.7 mm (4.91 in) |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) | 8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 373 g (13.16 oz) | 366 g (12.91 oz) |
| Area | 265 cm² (41.08 in²) | 265 cm² (41.08 in²) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Green |
- Silver - Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Helio P22T |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/1.5 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | CorePilot |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 650 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 41 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 412 | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1427 | n/a |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 543 | n/a |
| CPU | 87644 | 53451 |
| GPU | 40113 | 15030 |
| Memory | 66546 | 41518 |
| UX | 75552 | 35782 |
| NanoReview Score | 269855 | 145781 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 1 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | 14 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | One UI 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 6650 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 3:40 h |
| Web Browsing | 11:43 h | 08:08 h |
| Video Playback | 15:55 h | 11:55 h |
| Games | 06:32 h | 04:59 h |
| Standby Mode | 135 h | 121 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 2 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 720p at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | n/a |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B13/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | July, 2024 yr | May, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2024 yr | June, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 95 | 160 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Accelerometer - Compass |
- Accelerometer - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes 8 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
