Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 vs Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 Manufactured in August, 2024, with display 8.7 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85, vs Xiaomi Redmi K Pad, Manufactured in June, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
- Larger display: 8.8in
- Higher pixel density: 403ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz
- Lighter design: 326g vs 373g
- Higher battery capacity: 7500mAh vs 6650mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 8.7 in | 8.8 in |
| Resolution | 800x1340 pixels | 1880x3008 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 179 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | 700 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.2 % | 82.9 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 82.8 % | n/a |
| Response time | 43 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1349:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 211.58 mm (8.33 in) | 205.1 mm (8.07 in) |
| Width | 125.48 mm (4.94 in) | 132 mm (5.2 in) |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) | 6.5 mm (0.26 in) |
| Weight | 373 g (13.16 oz) | 326 g (11.5 oz) |
| Area | 265 cm² (41.08 in²) | 271 cm² (42.01 in²) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Green |
- Black - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 3730 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 412 | 2657 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1427 | 8298 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 543 | n/a |
| CPU | 87644 | 652381 |
| GPU | 40113 | 1322761 |
| Memory | 66546 | 521453 |
| UX | 75552 | 511258 |
| NanoReview Score | 269855 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 14 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 6650 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Web Browsing | 11:43 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 15:55 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:32 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 135 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | 1/3.06" |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.3 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" | 1/4" |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
n/a |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | n/a |
| SIM Type | Nano | No |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | n/a |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B13/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Flagship |
| Announced | July, 2024 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2024 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 95 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Accelerometer - Compass |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes 67 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi K Pad the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0