Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2020)
53
out 100
VS
44
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Manufactured in September, 2023, with display 11 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680, vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2020), Manufactured in May, 2020with chipsetSamsung Exynos 9611. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
- Larger display: 11in
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 7040mAh
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2020)
- Higher pixel density: 224ppi
- Lighter design: 467g vs 478g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11 in | 10.4 in |
| Resolution | 1200x1920 pixels | 1200x2000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 5:3 |
| Pixel density | 207 ppi | 224 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.2 % | 81.6 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 93.1 % | 94.5 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 81970 Hz |
| Response time | 37 ms | 36 ms |
| Contrast | 1689:1 | 1734:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 255.53 mm (10.06 in) | 244.5 mm (9.63 in) |
| Width | 167.08 mm (6.58 in) | 154.3 mm (6.07 in) |
| Thickness | 7.36 mm (0.29 in) | 7 mm (0.28 in) |
| Weight | 478 g (16.86 oz) | 467 g (16.47 oz) |
| Area | 427 cm² (66.19 in²) | 377 cm² (58.44 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Green - Purple |
- Gray - Blue - Pink |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
- 4/1.7 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 10 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 54 |
| GPU Frequency | 1114 MHz | 1053 MHz |
| FLOPS | 284 GFLOPS | 113.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 412 | 372 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1423 | 1178 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 348 | 1456 |
| CPU | 91109 | 70076 |
| GPU | 40869 | 55712 |
| Memory | 68964 | 60670 |
| UX | 78274 | 59901 |
| NanoReview Score | 279216 | 246359 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 36.7 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 61 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 5 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 896 |
| Writing score | 9238 | 7178 |
| Web score | 6619 | 4923 |
| Video editing | 3677 | 5061 |
| Data manipulation | 5908 | 4815 |
| NanoReview Score | 6945 | 6104 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | 22 GB | 14.9 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | OneUI 5.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 8000 mAh | 7040 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (24% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 70 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:45 h | 2:45 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:41 h | 09:49 h |
| Video Playback | 12:28 h | 14:28 h |
| Games | 06:20 h | 06:18 h |
| Standby Mode | 183 h | 133 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 8 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | n/a |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" | 1/5.0" |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | n/a | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | n/a | 1 |
| SIM Type | No | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | n/a | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | August, 2023 yr | April, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2023 yr | May, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 249 | 349 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Accelerometer |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes 8 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
