Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE vs Xiaomi Pad 6
53
out 100
VS
66
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Manufactured in September, 2023, with display 11 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680, vs Xiaomi Pad 6, Manufactured in April, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 870. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
- Lighter design: 478g vs 490g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 6
- Higher pixel density: 309ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8840mAh vs 8000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 1200x1920 pixels | 1800x2880 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 207 ppi | 309 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 550 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.2 % | 83.6 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 93.1 % | 97 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 181600 Hz |
| Response time | 37 ms | 26 ms |
| Contrast | 1689:1 | 832:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 255.53 mm (10.06 in) | 253.95 mm (10 in) |
| Width | 167.08 mm (6.58 in) | 165.18 mm (6.5 in) |
| Thickness | 7.36 mm (0.29 in) | 6.51 mm (0.26 in) |
| Weight | 478 g (16.86 oz) | 490 g (17.28 oz) |
| Area | 427 cm² (66.19 in²) | 419 cm² (64.95 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Green - Purple |
- Silver - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/3.2 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Hexagon 698 |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 1114 MHz | 670 MHz |
| FLOPS | 284 GFLOPS | 1029.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 412 | 1335 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1423 | 3584 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 348 | 3371 |
| CPU | 91109 | 219811 |
| GPU | 40869 | 277960 |
| Memory | 68964 | 129368 |
| UX | 78274 | 199071 |
| NanoReview Score | 279216 | 826210 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 44.2 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 71 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 21 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 3635 |
| Writing score | 9238 | n/a |
| Web score | 6619 | n/a |
| Video editing | 3677 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5908 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 6945 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | 22 GB | 21 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 8000 mAh | 8840 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (24% in 30 min) | Yes (38% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:45 h | 1:30 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:41 h | 10:22 h |
| Video Playback | 12:28 h | 14:17 h |
| Games | 06:20 h | 06:47 h |
| Standby Mode | 183 h | 139 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | No | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" | 1/4.0" |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | n/a |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | August, 2023 yr | April, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2023 yr | April, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 249 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Accelerometer |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 6 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
