Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE vs Xiaomi Pad 8
53
out 100
VS
88
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Manufactured in September, 2023, with display 11 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680, vs Xiaomi Pad 8, Manufactured in September, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
- Lighter design: 478g vs 485g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 8
- Larger display: 11.2in
- Higher pixel density: 344ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 9200mAh vs 8000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Fingerprint scanner
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11 in | 11.2 in |
| Resolution | 1200x1920 pixels | 2136x3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 207 ppi | 344 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.2 % | 85.7 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 93.1 % | n/a |
| Response time | 37 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1689:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 255.53 mm (10.06 in) | 251.22 mm (9.89 in) |
| Width | 167.08 mm (6.58 in) | 173.42 mm (6.83 in) |
| Thickness | 7.36 mm (0.29 in) | 5.75 mm (0.23 in) |
| Weight | 478 g (16.86 oz) | 485 g (17.11 oz) |
| Area | 427 cm² (66.19 in²) | 436 cm² (67.58 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Green - Purple |
- Black - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 321 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
- 2/2.02 (Cortex-A720) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Adreno 825 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 1114 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | 284 GFLOPS | 2355.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 412 | 2110 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1423 | 6823 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 348 | n/a |
| CPU | 91109 | 448783 |
| GPU | 40869 | 876015 |
| Memory | 68964 | 426634 |
| UX | 78274 | 325733 |
| NanoReview Score | 279216 | n/a |
| Writing score | 9238 | n/a |
| Web score | 6619 | n/a |
| Video editing | 3677 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5908 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 6945 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 22 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | HyperOS 3 |
Battery
| Volume | 8000 mAh | 9200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (24% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:45 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 10:41 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 12:28 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:20 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 183 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.3 |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Flagship |
| Announced | August, 2023 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2023 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 249 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Accelerometer |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 8 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
