Xiaomi Redmi Pad vs Honor Pad X9

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Pad Manufactured in October, 2022, with display 10.61 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Honor Pad X9, Manufactured in July, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad
  • Higher pixel density: 220ppi
  • Lighter design: 445g vs 499g
  • Higher battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 7250mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5.1
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
  • Includes charger
Reasons to choose Honor Pad X9
  • Larger display: 11.5in
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 3/64 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB
n/a

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Redmi Pad and Honor Pad X9
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD TFT LCD
Size 10.61 in 11.5 in
Resolution 1200x2000 pixels 1200x2000 pixels
Aspect ratio 5:3 5:3
Pixel density 220 ppi 203 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness 400 nits 450 nits
HDR support No No
Screen-to-body ratio 81 % 84.1 %
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
400 nits
Honor Pad X9
457 nits
sRGB gamut96.6 %n/a
Response time30 msn/a
Contrast1493:1n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 250.38 mm (9.86 in) 267.3 mm (10.52 in)
Width 157.98 mm (6.22 in) 167.4 mm (6.59 in)
Thickness 7.05 mm (0.28 in) 6.9 mm (0.27 in)
Weight 445 g (15.7 oz) 499 g (17.6 oz)
Area 396 cm² (61.38 in²) 447 cm² (69.29 in²)
Water resistance No No
Back panel Metal Metal
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Silver
- Gray
- Green
Gray
Fingerprint sensor No No
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
81 %
Honor Pad X9
84.1 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Redmi Pad and Honor Pad X9 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
Max Frequency 2200 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)
- 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53)
- 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 6 nm
Neural Processor Yes Hexagon 686
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Adreno 610
GPU Cores 128 128
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 1260 MHz
FLOPS 128 GFLOPS 322.6 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
735
Honor Pad X9
477
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
1994
Honor Pad X9
1551
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)735477
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)19941551
Geekbench Compute (GPU)1301570
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
303809
Honor Pad X9
323692
CPU91220110393
GPU5926140144
Memory7559892324
UX7773080831
NanoReview Score303809323692

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 3 GB 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity64 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13) Android 13
OS Size 22.9 GB n/a
UI Skin MIUI 13 MagicOS 7.1

Battery

Volume 8000 mAh 7250 mAh
Max Charging Power 18 W 225 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes No
Fast Charging Yes (25% in 30 min) Yes (34% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 2:21 h 2:04 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
n/a
Honor Pad X9
25:36
Web Browsingn/a08:56 h
Video Playbackn/a11:02 h
Gamesn/a07:03 h
Standby Moden/a155 h

Main camera

Matrix 8 MP 5 MP
Photo resolution n/a 2592x1944 pixels
Zoom n/a Digital
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion No No
Lenses count Standard: 8 MP Standard: 5 MP
Features
Main lens
Matrix8 MP5 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
Focal length26 mmn/a
SensorGalaxyCore GC08A3n/a
Sensor size1/4"n/a
Pixel size1.12 μmn/a
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 5 MP
Matrix n/a 2592x1944 pixels
Aperture f/2.3 f/2.2
Focal length 17 mm n/a
Sensor SK Hynix Hi-846 n/a
Sensor size 1/4" n/a
Pixel size 1.12 μm n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.1
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS n/a - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* No No
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*n/a1
SIM TypeNoNano
eSIM Support *n/aNo
Hybrid Slotn/aNo
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers 4.0 6.0
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
86 dB
Honor Pad X9
n/a

Other

Class Mid-range Budget
Announced October, 2022 yr July, 2023 yr
Release Date October, 2022 yr July, 2023 yr
Launch Price ($) 239 n/a
Sensors - Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
Charger Included Yes 22 W No
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which tablet would you pick?
3 (42.86%)
4 (57.14%)
Total Votes: 7

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below