Xiaomi Redmi Pad vs Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
53
out 100
VS
70
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Pad Manufactured in October, 2022, with display 10.61 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Huawei MatePad 11.5 S, Manufactured in May, 2024with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9000WL. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad
- Lighter design: 445g vs 510g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
- Larger display: 11.5in
- Higher pixel density: 291ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8800mAh vs 8000mAh
- Supports newer USB: 3.0 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 10.61 in | 11.5 in |
| Resolution | 1200x2000 pixels | 1840x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 220 ppi | 291 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | n/a |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81 % | 85.1 % |
| sRGB gamut | 96.6 % | 97.4 % |
| Response time | 30 ms | 23 ms |
| Contrast | 1493:1 | 516:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 250.38 mm (9.86 in) | 261 mm (10.28 in) |
| Width | 157.98 mm (6.22 in) | 177.2 mm (6.98 in) |
| Thickness | 7.05 mm (0.28 in) | 6.2 mm (0.24 in) |
| Weight | 445 g (15.7 oz) | 510 g (17.99 oz) |
| Area | 396 cm² (61.38 in²) | 462 cm² (71.61 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Green |
- Silver - Gray - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | HiSilicon Kirin 9000WL |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2490 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | n/a |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
n/a |
| Process | TSMC | n/a |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | n/a |
| Neural Processor | Yes | n/a |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 128 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 735 | 1241 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1994 | 3882 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1301 | 2591 |
| CPU | 91220 | 213665 |
| GPU | 59261 | n/a |
| Memory | 75598 | 148262 |
| UX | 77730 | 148835 |
| NanoReview Score | 303809 | 510762 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | n/a |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | HarmonyOS 4.2 |
| OS Size | 22.9 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 13 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 8000 mAh | 8800 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 225 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (25% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:21 h | 2:00 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC08A3 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Matrix | n/a | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | SK Hynix Hi-846 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.0 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2022 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2022 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 239 | 399 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 22 W | Yes 22 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Huawei MatePad 11.5 S the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
