Xiaomi Redmi Pad vs Xiaomi Pad 6
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Pad Manufactured in October, 2022, with display 10.61 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Xiaomi Pad 6, Manufactured in April, 2023with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 870. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Pad
- Lighter design: 445g vs 490g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Pad 6
- Larger display: 11in
- Higher pixel density: 309ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8840mAh vs 8000mAh
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 10.61 in | 11 in |
| Resolution | 1200x2000 pixels | 1800x2880 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 16:10 |
| Pixel density | 220 ppi | 309 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 550 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81 % | 83.6 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 96.6 % | 97 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 181600 Hz |
| Response time | 30 ms | 26 ms |
| Contrast | 1493:1 | 832:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 250.38 mm (9.86 in) | 253.95 mm (10 in) |
| Width | 157.98 mm (6.22 in) | 165.18 mm (6.5 in) |
| Thickness | 7.05 mm (0.28 in) | 6.51 mm (0.26 in) |
| Weight | 445 g (15.7 oz) | 490 g (17.28 oz) |
| Area | 396 cm² (61.38 in²) | 419 cm² (64.95 in²) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Metal |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Green |
- Silver - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/3.2 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon 698 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 670 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 1029.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 735 | 1335 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1994 | 3584 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1301 | 3371 |
| CPU | 91220 | 219811 |
| GPU | 59261 | 277960 |
| Memory | 75598 | 129368 |
| UX | 77730 | 199071 |
| NanoReview Score | 303809 | 826210 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 44.2 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 71 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 21 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 3635 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | 22.9 GB | 21 GB |
| UI Skin | MIUI 13 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 8000 mAh | 8840 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (25% in 30 min) | Yes (38% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:21 h | 1:30 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 10:22 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 14:17 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:47 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 139 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Zoom | n/a | Digital |
| Flash | No | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC08A3 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4" | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | SK Hynix Hi-846 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Type | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | n/a |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2022 yr | April, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2022 yr | April, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 239 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 22 W | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Pad 6 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2