AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395 vs Intel Core 7 250H

Compared 2 processors: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395, vs Intel Core 7 250H. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395 and Intel Core 7 250H
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395
2029
Intel Core 7 250H
1849
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395
29105
Intel Core 7 250H
16800
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395
117
Intel Core 7 250H
108
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395
1640
Intel Core 7 250H
898
PassMark
PassMark CPU (Single-Core)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395
n/a
Intel Core 7 250H
4321
PassMark CPU (Multi-Core)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395
n/a
Intel Core 7 250H
31840
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395
2976
Intel Core 7 250H
2766
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395
20948
Intel Core 7 250H
13928
File Compression1700 MB/sn/a
Clang Compilation184.7 KLines/sn/a
HTML5 Browser478.7 pages/sn/a
PDF Rendering519.1 MP/secn/a
Text Processing312 pages/sn/a
Background Blur72.2 frames/sn/a
Photo Processing200 frames/sn/a
Ray Tracing42.8 MP/secn/a

Blender

Real-world 3D modeling test
Blender CPU
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395
n/a
Intel Core 7 250H
200.73

Performance/Watt

Points per watt of PL1 TDP
Geekbench 6 Multi / W 380.9 PPW 309.5 PPW
PassMark CPU / W n/a 707.6 PPW
Cinebench 2024 / W 29.8 PPW 20 PPW
Blender / W n/a 4.46 PPW

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Intel
Announced January, 7, 2025 December, 18, 2024
Type Laptop use Laptop use
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen 5 (Strix Halo) Raptor Lake
Model number n/a 250H
Integrated GPU Radeon 8060S Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)

Processor

Performance cores
Cores 16 6
Threads 32 12
Frequency 3.0 GHz 2.5 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo) 5.1 GHz 5.4 GHz
Efficiency cores
Coresn/a8
Threadsn/a8
Frequencyn/a1.8 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo)n/a4 GHz
General
Cores count1614
Threads count3220
Bus frequency100 MHz100 MHz
Multiplier30x25x
L1 cache80 KB/core80 KB/core
L2 cache1000 KB/core2000 KB/core
L3 Cache64 MB total24 MB total
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Package

Process tech. 4 nm 10 nm
Power (TDP) 45-55 W 35-45 W
Max TDP (Boost) 120 W 115 W
Socket Custom BGA-1744
Critical temp. 100 °C 100 °C

Memory Support

Memory Type LPDDR5X-8000 - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
- LPDDR5-6400
- LPDDR5x-6400
- LPDDR4x-4267
Max Size 128 GB 96 GB
Channels 2 2
ECC support Yes No

Other

PCIe Version 4.0 5.0
Max PCIe Lanes 16 28

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which CPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
3 (100%)
Total Votes: 3

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below