Apple M1 vs AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
52
out 100
VS
62
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Apple M1, vs AMD Ryzen 7 H 255. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 33.3 GOps/s | 97.5 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 35.6 GOps/s | 59.7 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 142 M primes/s | 88 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 21.1 M strings/s | 42.5 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 8.6 GB/s | 20.6 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 168.8 MB/s | 349.6 MB/s |
| Physics | 1364 frames/s | 1391 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 69 M matrices/s | 259 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 936.1 MB/s | 1020 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 71.3 KLines/s | 99.8 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 204.8 pages/s | 255.5 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 241.1 MP/sec | 378.2 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 242.5 pages/s | 259.2 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 34.8 frames/s | 61.1 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 79.9 frames/s | 99.7 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 9.28 MP/sec | 21.5 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 626.1 PPW | 234.6 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 1010.5 PPW | 532.9 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 31.8 PPW | 17.1 PPW |
| Blender / W | 6.81 PPW | 4.1 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Apple | AMD |
| Announced | November, 20, 2020 | August, 4, 2025 |
| Type | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | ARMv8 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Apple M1 | Zen 4 (Hawk Point) |
| Integrated GPU | Apple M1 GPU | Radeon 780M |
Processor
| Cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | n/a | 4.9 GHz |
| Cores | 4 | n/a |
| Threads | 4 | n/a |
| Frequency | 2.1 GHz | n/a |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Threads count | 8 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | n/a | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | n/a | 38x |
| L1 cache | 192 KB/core | 64 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 12 KB/core | 1000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 16 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Transistor count | 16 billion | 25 billion |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 14 W | 35-54 W |
| Socket | Apple M-Socket | FP8 |
| Critical temp. | n/a | 100 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X-4266 | - DDR5-5600 - LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max Size | 16 GB | 256 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Max memory bandwidth | 68.25 GB | n/a |
Other
| PCIe Version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | n/a | 20 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
