Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
20
out 100
VS
71
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Celeron N5095, vs Intel Core Ultra X7 358H. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 12.8 GOps/s | 83.2 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 8.2 GOps/s | 105.6 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 14 M primes/s | 350 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 7.6 M strings/s | 41.8 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 3.1 GB/s | 26.7 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 54.2 MB/s | 346.8 MB/s |
| Physics | 288 frames/s | 3055 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 15 M matrices/s | 289 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 161.4 MB/s | 1350 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 14.2 KLines/s | 75.9 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 48.7 pages/s | 432.9 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 62.7 MP/sec | 446.5 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 97.4 pages/s | 289.4 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 4.88 frames/s | 66 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 8.05 frames/s | 152 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 2.37 MP/sec | 26.2 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 94.2 PPW | 675.9 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 270.3 PPW | 1358.6 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | n/a | 45 PPW |
| Blender / W | 1.18 PPW | 11.27 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | January, 1, 2021 | January, 5, 2026 |
| Type | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Jasper Lake | Panther Lake |
| Model number | N5095 | 358H |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | Arc B390 |
Processor
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | n/a | 4.8 GHz |
| Cores | n/a | 12 |
| Threads | n/a | 12 |
| Frequency | n/a | 1.5 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | n/a | 3.7 GHz |
| Cores count | 4 | 16 |
| Threads count | 4 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 20x | 19x |
| L1 cache | n/a | 192 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 384 KB/core | 2560 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB total | 18 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Process tech. | 10 nm | 2 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 15 W | 15-25 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | n/a | 80 W |
| Socket | BGA-1338 | FCBGA2540 |
| Critical temp. | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - DDR4-2933 - LPDDR4x-2933 |
LPDDR5X-9600 |
| Max Size | 16 GB | 96 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 153.6 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 8 | 12 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra X7 358H the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
