Intel Core 5 220H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
57
out 100
VS
73
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core 5 220H, vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 64.1 GOps/s | 83.4 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 47 GOps/s | 106.9 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 81 M primes/s | 340 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 24.8 M strings/s | 38.3 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 13.1 GB/s | 24.7 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 228.3 MB/s | 311.8 MB/s |
| Physics | 1488 frames/s | 2510 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 141 M matrices/s | 252 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1110 MB/s | 1470 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 86.1 KLines/s | 136.6 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 317.1 pages/s | 434.7 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 390.2 MP/sec | 529.3 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 252.2 pages/s | 353 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 52.9 frames/s | 79.5 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 122.3 frames/s | 172 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 19.2 MP/sec | 27.1 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 272.2 PPW | 391.7 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 441.6 PPW | 728 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 15.6 PPW | 25.7 PPW |
| Blender / W | n/a | 4.56 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | December, 18, 2024 | January, 6, 2025 |
| Type | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Raptor Lake | Arrow Lake |
| Model number | 220H | 285H |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics Xe G4 (80EU) | Arc Graphics 140T |
Processor
| Cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.9 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Cores | 8 | 10 |
| Threads | 8 | 10 |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 3.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Cores count | 12 | 16 |
| Threads count | 16 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 27x | 29x |
| L1 cache | 80 KB/core | 112 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | 2000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB total | 24 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Process tech. | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 35-45 W | 35-45 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Socket | BGA-1744 | FCBGA-2049 |
| Critical temp. | 100 °C | 110 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - DDR5-5200 - DDR4-3200 - LPDDR5-5200 - LPDDR5x-5200 - LPDDR4x-4267 |
- LPDDR5-8400 - LPDDR5x-8400 - DDR5-6400 |
| Max Size | 96 GB | 128 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | No |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 9 285H the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
