Intel Core i9 11980HK vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
51
out 100
VS
98
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core i9 11980HK, vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 79 GOps/s | 174.7 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 46.4 GOps/s | 226.9 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 101 M primes/s | 612 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 31.8 M strings/s | 95.7 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 13.9 GB/s | 58.4 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 267.5 MB/s | 790.6 MB/s |
| Physics | 1112 frames/s | 4259 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 177 M matrices/s | 63 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 961.5 MB/s | 2000 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 86.4 KLines/s | 297.3 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 203.2 pages/s | 635.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 334.4 MP/sec | 716 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 222.1 pages/s | 447.5 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 33.9 frames/s | 116 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 84 frames/s | 210.5 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 18.5 MP/sec | 59 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 162.2 PPW | 219.2 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 346.2 PPW | 545.7 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | n/a | 19.9 PPW |
| Blender / W | 3.19 PPW | 4.92 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | May, 11, 2021 | March, 12, 2026 |
| Type | Laptop use | PC use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake | Arrow Lake |
| Model number | i9-11980HK | 270K+ |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (32 EU) | Arc iGPU (4-Cores) |
Processor
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2.6-3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| Cores | n/a | 16 |
| Threads | n/a | 16 |
| Frequency | n/a | 3.2 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | n/a | 4.7 GHz |
| Cores count | 8 | 24 |
| Threads count | 16 | 24 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | n/a |
| Multiplier | 26-33x | 37x |
| L1 cache | 96 KB/core | 192 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 1280 KB/core | 3000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB total | 36 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Package
| Transistor count | n/a | 17.8 billion |
| Process tech. | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 45-65 W | 125 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 110 W | 250 W |
| Socket | BGA-1787 | FCLGA-1851 |
| Critical temp. | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-7200 |
| Max Size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
| Max memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB | 115.2 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
