Intel Core Ultra 5 125U vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
50
out 100
VS
64
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 56.8 GOps/s | 99.4 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 41.1 GOps/s | 60.4 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 63 M primes/s | 89 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 21.1 M strings/s | 40.3 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 11.9 GB/s | 20.8 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 191.3 MB/s | 348.1 MB/s |
| Physics | 1089 frames/s | 1385 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 11 M matrices/s | 259 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 958.1 MB/s | 1120 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 65.6 KLines/s | 102.5 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 223.8 pages/s | 217.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 243.9 MP/sec | 350 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 213.2 pages/s | 251.8 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 40.3 frames/s | 59.4 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 93.4 frames/s | 87.6 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 13.8 MP/sec | 22.5 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 761.3 PPW | 223.8 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 1421.6 PPW | 533.5 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 41.1 PPW | 17.5 PPW |
| Blender / W | 9.14 PPW | 4.05 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Announced | December, 14, 2023 | January, 4, 2023 |
| Type | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake | Zen 4 (Phoenix) |
| Model number | 125U | n/a |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics (4-Cores) | Radeon 780M |
Processor
| Cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Frequency | 1.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Cores | 10 | n/a |
| Threads | 10 | n/a |
| Frequency | 0.8 GHz | n/a |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 3.6 GHz | n/a |
| Cores count | 12 | 8 |
| Threads count | 14 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 13x | 38x |
| L1 cache | 112 KB/core | 64 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | 1000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB total | 16 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Transistor count | n/a | 25 billion |
| Process tech. | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 12 W | 35-54 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 57 W | n/a |
| Socket | FCBGA-2049 | FP8 |
| Critical temp. | 110 °C | 100 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - LPDDR5-7467 - LPDDR5x-7467 - DDR5-5600 |
- DDR5-5600 - LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max Size | 96 GB | 256 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| PCIe Version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Note
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS:
DDR5 memory is supported only on the FP7r2 socket, while FP7 and FP8 sockets support LPDDR5/x. ECC support is available exclusively on the FP7r2 socket.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
