Intel Core Ultra 5 225F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus
67
out 100
VS
84
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 5 225F, vs Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | n/a | 131.4 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | n/a | 172.6 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | n/a | 434 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | n/a | 72.4 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | n/a | 44.3 GB/s |
| Data Compression | n/a | 590.9 MB/s |
| Physics | n/a | 3237 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | n/a | 464 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | n/a | 1600 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | n/a | 211.6 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 485.7 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 588 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | n/a | 400 pages/s |
| Background Blur | n/a | 95.2 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 170.8 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 39.7 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 226.6 PPW | 171.2 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 486.1 PPW | 429.5 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 14.3 PPW | 14.8 PPW |
| Blender / W | 3.29 PPW | 3.46 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | December, 18, 2024 | March, 12, 2026 |
| Type | PC use | PC use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Arrow Lake |
| Model number | 225F | 250K+ |
| Integrated GPU | No | Arc iGPU (4-Cores) |
Processor
| Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Threads | 6 | 6 |
| Frequency | 3.3 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.9 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Frequency | 2.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Cores count | 10 | 18 |
| Threads count | 10 | 18 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 33x | 42x |
| L1 cache | 192 KB/core | 192 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 3000 KB/core | 3000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB total | 30 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Package
| Transistor count | n/a | 17.8 billion |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 121 W | 159 W |
| Socket | FCLGA-1851 | FCLGA-1851 |
| Critical temp. | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-7200 |
| Max Size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 115.2 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
| Tech | - Compute: ABM, ADX, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA - Performance: EIST, TBT 2.0, Thread Director - Virtualization: VMD, VT-d, VT-x - Security: RDRAND, TXT, XD bit |
n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
