Intel Core Ultra 5 235 vs Apple M4 Max (14-Core)
74
out 100
VS
88
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 5 235, vs Apple M4 Max (14-Core). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 94.1 GOps/s | 84.7 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 126.5 GOps/s | 86.3 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 403 M primes/s | 542 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 50.2 M strings/s | 55.7 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 31.4 GB/s | 23.2 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 418.2 MB/s | 494.3 MB/s |
| Physics | 3151 frames/s | 5623 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 352 M matrices/s | 267 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1370 MB/s | 2360 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 144.6 KLines/s | 191.8 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 421.5 pages/s | 604.5 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 487.4 MP/sec | 588.1 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 332.5 pages/s | 375.9 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 84.8 frames/s | 86.9 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 153.9 frames/s | 216.8 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 29.6 MP/sec | 30.7 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 274.4 PPW | 375.4 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 624.9 PPW | 622.3 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 18.9 PPW | 28.1 PPW |
| Blender / W | 4.12 PPW | n/a |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Apple |
| Announced | December, 18, 2024 | October, 30, 2024 |
| Type | PC use | Laptop use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | ARMv9 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Apple M4 |
| Model number | 235 | n/a |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics | Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core) |
Processor
| Cores | 6 | 10 |
| Threads | 6 | 10 |
| Frequency | 3.4 GHz | 4.52 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5 GHz | n/a |
| Cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.59 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.4 GHz | n/a |
| Cores count | 14 | 14 |
| Threads count | 14 | 14 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | n/a |
| Multiplier | 34x | 45x |
| L1 cache | 192 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 3000 KB/core | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB total | n/a |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 62 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 121 W | n/a |
| Socket | FCLGA-1851 | Apple M-Socket |
| Critical temp. | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | DDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X-8533 |
| Max Size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 8 |
| ECC support | Yes | No |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 410 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | n/a |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 24 | n/a |
| Tech | - Compute: ABM, ADX, AVX-VNNI, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA - Performance: CFET, EIST, TBT 2.0, Thread Director - Virtualization: VT-d, VT-rp, VT-x - Security: MBEC, RDRAND, SIPP, TDT, TXT, XD bit, vPro |
n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple M4 Max (14-Core) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
