Intel Core Ultra 7 255H vs Intel Core i9 14900F
70
out 100
VS
84
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, vs Intel Core i9 14900F. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | n/a | 180.2 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | n/a | 120.9 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | n/a | 205 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | n/a | 63.4 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | n/a | 34.7 GB/s |
| Data Compression | n/a | 567 MB/s |
| Physics | n/a | 2863 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | n/a | 312 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1270 MB/s | 1670 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 103.2 KLines/s | 220.2 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 399 pages/s | 436 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 443.6 MP/sec | 545.8 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 283.7 pages/s | 307.6 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 62.4 frames/s | 61.7 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 144.8 frames/s | 134.9 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 24 MP/sec | 46.5 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 540.1 PPW | 305.5 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | n/a | 717.6 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 36.7 PPW | n/a |
| Blender / W | n/a | 5.53 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | January, 6, 2025 | January, 9, 2024 |
| Type | Laptop use | PC use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Raptor Lake Refresh |
| Model number | 255H | i9-14900F |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics 140T | No |
Processor
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 6 | 16 |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5.1 GHz | 5.8 GHz |
| Cores | 10 | 16 |
| Threads | 10 | 16 |
| Frequency | 1.5 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.4 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Cores count | 16 | 24 |
| Threads count | 16 | 32 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 20x | 20x |
| L1 cache | 112 KB/core | 80 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | 2000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB total | 36 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 20-28 W | 65 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 115 W | 219 W |
| Socket | FCBGA-2049 | LGA-1700 |
| Critical temp. | 110 °C | 100 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - LPDDR5-8400 - LPDDR5x-8400 - DDR5-6400 |
- DDR5-5600 - DDR4-3200 |
| Max Size | 128 GB | 192 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 89.6 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 28 | 20 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core i9 14900F the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
