Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 7 265, vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
2156
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2035
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
28684
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
23786
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
131
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
114
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
1519
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1152
PassMark
PassMark CPU (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
4714
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
3959
PassMark CPU (Multi-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
49003
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
35190
Integer Math139.9 GOps/s123.3 GOps/s
Floating-Point Math174.3 GOps/s77.2 GOps/s
Prime Number Search412 M primes/s124 M primes/s
Random String Sort61.5 M strings/s48.8 M strings/s
Data Encryption39.2 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Data Compression500.2 MB/s448 MB/s
Physics3128 frames/s1878 frames/s
Extended Instructions384 M matrices/s319 M matrices/s
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
2992
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2985
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
19813
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15976
File Compression1350 MB/s1340 MB/s
Clang Compilation172.4 KLines/s139.9 KLines/s
HTML5 Browser416.8 pages/s335.1 pages/s
PDF Rendering560.4 MP/sec468.2 MP/sec
Text Processing337.1 pages/s322.1 pages/s
Background Blur88.5 frames/s63.8 frames/s
Photo Processing158.7 frames/s124.6 frames/s
Ray Tracing41.1 MP/sec33.5 MP/sec

Blender

Real-world 3D modeling test
Blender CPU
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
338.98
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
281.07

Performance/Watt

Points per watt of PL1 TDP
Geekbench 6 Multi / W 304.8 PPW 295.9 PPW
PassMark CPU / W 753.9 PPW 651.7 PPW
Cinebench 2024 / W 23.4 PPW 21.3 PPW
Blender / W 5.22 PPW 5.21 PPW

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Announced December, 18, 2024 June, 3, 2024
Type PC use Laptop use
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Zen 5 (Strix Point)
Model number 265 n/a
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics Radeon 890M

Processor

Performance cores
Cores 8 4
Threads 8 8
Frequency 2.4 GHz 2.0 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo) 5.3 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficiency cores
Cores128
Threads1216
Frequency1.8 GHz2.0 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo)4.6 GHz3.3 GHz
General
Cores count2012
Threads count2024
Bus frequency100 MHz100 MHz
Multiplier24x20x
L1 cache192 KB/core80 KB/core
L2 cache3000 KB/core1000 KB/core
L3 Cache30 MB total24 MB total
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Package

Process tech. 3 nm 4 nm
Power (TDP) 65 W 15-54 W
Max TDP (Boost) 182 W n/a
Socket FCLGA-1851 FP8
Critical temp. 105 °C 100 °C

Memory Support

Memory Type DDR5-6400 - DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5X-8000
Max Size 256 GB 256 GB
Channels 2 2
ECC support Yes No

Other

PCIe Version 5.0 4.0
Max PCIe Lanes 24 16
Tech - Compute: ABM, ADX, AVX-VNNI, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA
- Performance: CFET, EIST, TBMT 3.0, TBT 2.0, Thread Director
- Virtualization: VT-d, VT-rp, VT-x
- Security: MBEC, RDRAND, SIPP, TDT, TXT, XD bit, vPro
n/a

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which CPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
2 (100%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below