Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
73
out 100
VS
94
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 83.4 GOps/s | 174.1 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 106.9 GOps/s | 227 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 340 M primes/s | 549 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 38.3 M strings/s | 96.3 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 24.7 GB/s | 58.6 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 311.8 MB/s | 799.2 MB/s |
| Physics | 2510 frames/s | 4081 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 252 M matrices/s | 626 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1470 MB/s | 1560 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 136.6 KLines/s | 242.2 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 434.7 pages/s | 479.5 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 529.3 MP/sec | 622.1 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 353 pages/s | 371.2 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 79.5 frames/s | 95.4 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 172 frames/s | 164.2 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 27.1 MP/sec | 52.3 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 391.7 PPW | 184.8 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 728 PPW | 544.3 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 25.7 PPW | 18.9 PPW |
| Blender / W | 4.56 PPW | 4.47 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Announced | January, 6, 2025 | October, 11, 2024 |
| Type | Laptop use | PC use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Arrow Lake |
| Model number | 285H | 285K |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics 140T | Arc iGPU (4-Cores) |
Processor
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5.4 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Cores | 10 | 16 |
| Threads | 10 | 16 |
| Frequency | 2.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Cores count | 16 | 24 |
| Threads count | 16 | 24 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 37x |
| L1 cache | 112 KB/core | 112 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | 3000 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB total | 36 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Package
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 35-45 W | 125 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 115 W | 250 W |
| Socket | FCBGA-2049 | FCLGA-1851 |
| Critical temp. | 110 °C | 105 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | - LPDDR5-8400 - LPDDR5x-8400 - DDR5-6400 |
DDR5-6400 |
| Max Size | 128 GB | 192 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 28 | 24 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 9 285K the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
