Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
94
out 100
VS
65
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, vs AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Integer Math | 174.1 GOps/s | 186.1 GOps/s |
| Floating-Point Math | 227 GOps/s | 100.2 GOps/s |
| Prime Number Search | 549 M primes/s | 229 M primes/s |
| Random String Sort | 96.3 M strings/s | 65.3 M strings/s |
| Data Encryption | 58.6 GB/s | 39.7 GB/s |
| Data Compression | 799.2 MB/s | 625.2 MB/s |
| Physics | 4081 frames/s | 1884 frames/s |
| Extended Instructions | 626 M matrices/s | 405 M matrices/s |
| File Compression | 1560 MB/s | 1120 MB/s |
| Clang Compilation | 242.2 KLines/s | 147.1 KLines/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 479.5 pages/s | 224.5 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 622.1 MP/sec | 372.1 MP/sec |
| Text Processing | 371.2 pages/s | 222.5 pages/s |
| Background Blur | 95.4 frames/s | 28.4 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 164.2 frames/s | 85 frames/s |
| Ray Tracing | 52.3 MP/sec | 38.4 MP/sec |
Blender
Performance/Watt
| Geekbench 6 Multi / W | 184.8 PPW | 121.2 PPW |
| PassMark CPU / W | 544.3 PPW | 433.1 PPW |
| Cinebench 2024 / W | 18.9 PPW | 13.9 PPW |
| Blender / W | 4.47 PPW | 3.94 PPW |
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Announced | October, 11, 2024 | October, 8, 2020 |
| Type | PC use | PC use |
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Zen 3 (Vermeer) |
| Model number | 285K | n/a |
| Integrated GPU | Arc iGPU (4-Cores) | No |
Processor
| Cores | 8 | 16 |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Frequency | 3.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 5.5 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Cores | 16 | n/a |
| Threads | 16 | n/a |
| Frequency | 3.2 GHz | n/a |
| Max Frequency (Turbo) | 4.6 GHz | n/a |
| Cores count | 24 | 16 |
| Threads count | 24 | 32 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 37x | 34x |
| L1 cache | 112 KB/core | 64 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 3000 KB/core | 512 KB/core |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB total | 64 MB total |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Package
| Transistor count | n/a | 4.15 billion |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 7 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 125 W | 105 W |
| Max TDP (Boost) | 250 W | 142 W |
| Socket | FCLGA-1851 | AM4 |
| Critical temp. | 105 °C | 95 °C |
Memory Support
| Memory Type | DDR5-6400 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max Size | 192 GB | 128 GB |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory bandwidth | n/a | 47.68 GB |
Other
| PCIe Version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Max PCIe Lanes | 24 | 20 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 9 285K the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
