Intel Core Ultra 9 288V vs AMD Ryzen 7 H 255

Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, vs AMD Ryzen 7 H 255. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Core Ultra 9 288V and AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
1878
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
n/a
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
10522
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
n/a
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
122
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
100
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
545
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
923
PassMark
PassMark CPU (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
4345
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
n/a
PassMark CPU (Multi-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
20791
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
n/a
Integer Math45.2 GOps/s97.5 GOps/s
Floating-Point Math62 GOps/s59.7 GOps/s
Prime Number Search211 M primes/s88 M primes/s
Random String Sort23.7 M strings/s42.5 M strings/s
Data Encryption14.9 GB/s20.6 GB/s
Data Compression195.8 MB/s349.6 MB/s
Physics1746 frames/s1391 frames/s
Extended Instructions167 M matrices/s259 M matrices/s
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
2864
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
n/a
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
11069
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
n/a
File Compression1020 MB/s1020 MB/s
Clang Compilation69 KLines/s99.8 KLines/s
HTML5 Browser278.5 pages/s255.5 pages/s
PDF Rendering290.7 MP/sec378.2 MP/sec
Text Processing312.1 pages/s259.2 pages/s
Background Blur49.8 frames/s61.1 frames/s
Photo Processing117 frames/s99.7 frames/s
Ray Tracing14.5 MP/sec21.5 MP/sec

Blender

Real-world 3D modeling test
Blender CPU
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
134.21
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
221.64

Performance/Watt

Points per watt of PL1 TDP
Geekbench 6 Multi / W 299.2 PPW 234.6 PPW
PassMark CPU / W 561.9 PPW 532.9 PPW
Cinebench 2024 / W 14.7 PPW 17.1 PPW
Blender / W 3.63 PPW 4.1 PPW

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Announced September, 4, 2024 August, 4, 2025
Type Laptop use Laptop use
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Lunar Lake Zen 4 (Hawk Point)
Model number 288V n/a
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics 140V Radeon 780M

Processor

Performance cores
Cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Frequency 3.3 GHz 3.8 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo) 5.1 GHz 4.9 GHz
Efficiency cores
Cores4n/a
Threads4n/a
Frequency3.3 GHzn/a
Max Frequency (Turbo)3.7 GHzn/a
General
Cores count88
Threads count816
Bus frequency100 MHz100 MHz
Multiplier33x38x
L1 cache192 KB/core64 KB/core
L2 cache2560 KB/core1000 KB/core
L3 Cache12 MB total16 MB total
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Package

Transistor count n/a 25 billion
Process tech. 3 nm 4 nm
Power (TDP) 17-37 W 35-54 W
Max TDP (Boost) 37 W n/a
Socket FCBGA-2833 FP8
Critical temp. 100 °C 100 °C

Memory Support

Memory Type LPDDR5X-8533 - DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5x-7500
Max Size 32 GB 256 GB
Channels 2 2
ECC support No No

Other

PCIe Version 5.0 4.0
Max PCIe Lanes 8 20

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which CPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below