Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Compared 2 processors: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Single-Thread Perf.
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Multi-Thread Perf.
Multi-Core Benchmark Score
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Integrated Graphics
iGPU Performance in Games & 3D
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
126
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
125
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
2219
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
1268
PassMark
PassMark CPU (Single-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
n/a
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
4279
PassMark CPU (Multi-Core)
Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
n/a
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
35270
Integer Math171.7 GOps/sn/a
Floating-Point Math220.9 GOps/sn/a
Prime Number Search585 M primes/sn/a
Random String Sort93.2 M strings/sn/a
Data Encryption56.3 GB/sn/a
Data Compression766.8 MB/sn/a
Physics3545 frames/sn/a
Extended Instructions606 M matrices/sn/a
GeekBench v6
File Compression1660 MB/s1420 MB/s
Clang Compilation217.2 KLines/s118.2 KLines/s
HTML5 Browser495.3 pages/s426.1 pages/s
PDF Rendering584.4 MP/sec483.8 MP/sec
Text Processing342.8 pages/s286.3 pages/s
Background Blur84 frames/s65.7 frames/s
Photo Processing160.2 frames/s157.6 frames/s
Ray Tracing46.4 MP/sec24.3 MP/sec

Blender

Real-world 3D modeling test
Blender CPU
Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
n/a
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
244.11

Performance/Watt

Points per watt of PL1 TDP
Geekbench 6 Multi / W 392.4 PPW 668.2 PPW
PassMark CPU / W 1201.5 PPW 1410.8 PPW
Cinebench 2024 / W 40.3 PPW 50.7 PPW
Blender / W n/a 9.76 PPW

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Intel
Announced January, 17, 2026 January, 5, 2026
Type Laptop use Laptop use
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Panther Lake
Model number 290HX 386H
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Xe3 Graphics

Processor

Performance cores
Cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Frequency 2.7 GHz 2.1 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo) 5.5 GHz 4.9 GHz
Efficiency cores
Cores1612
Threads1612
Frequency1.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Max Frequency (Turbo)4.7 GHz3.9 GHz
General
Cores count2416
Threads count2416
Bus frequency100 MHz100 MHz
Multiplier27x20x
L1 cache192 KB/core192 KB/core
L2 cache3000 KB/core2560 KB/core
L3 Cache36 MB total18 MB total
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Package

Process tech. 3 nm 2 nm
Power (TDP) 45-55 W 15-25 W
Max TDP (Boost) 160 W 80 W
Socket FCBGA-2114 FCBGA2540
Critical temp. 105 °C 100 °C

Memory Support

Memory Type DDR5-6400 - LPDDR5X-8533
- DDR5-7200
Max Size 256 GB 128 GB
Channels 2 2
ECC support No No
Max memory bandwidth n/a 115.2 GB

Other

PCIe Version 5.0 5.0
Max PCIe Lanes 24 20

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which CPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below