Adreno X1-85 vs Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core)
24
out 100
VS
58
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Adreno X1-85, vs Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Time Spy | 1702 | n/a |
| Solar Bay | 10370 | 79412 |
| Fire Strike | 6149 | n/a |
| Night Raid | 29031 | n/a |
| Background Blur | 36.4 frames/s | 257 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 17.3 frames/s | 182.1 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 1.19 Gpix/sec | 5.4 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 1.3 Gpix/sec | 8.33 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 1.42 Gpix/sec | 8.86 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.3 Gpix/sec | 1.28 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 72.4 Gpix/sec | 455.4 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 4692.5 fps | 21658 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 518 | n/a |
| DirectX 11 | 19 fps | n/a |
| DirectX 12 | 10 fps | n/a |
| GPU Compute | 1958 Ops/s | n/a |
| Image Classification (SP) | n/a | 10711 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | n/a | 42406 |
| Horizon Detection | n/a | 42905 |
| Face Detection (HP) | n/a | 73489 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | n/a | 289766 |
| Text Classification (SP) | n/a | 6087 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | n/a | 8881 |
| Object Detection (SP) | n/a | 10130 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | n/a | 84224 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | n/a | 264552 |
| Framework | n/a | Core ML |
| Backend | n/a | GPU |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Adreno | Apple |
| Build | Integrated | Integrated |
| Announced | October, 24, 2023 | March, 3, 2026 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Universal | Professional |
| Segment | Entry-level | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Adreno X1 | Apple M GPU |
| Codename | Adreno X1 | Custom |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 300 MHz | n/a |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1200-1500 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Shader Units | 1536 | 5120 |
| TMUs | 96 | 320 |
| ROPs | 48 | 160 |
| Execution Units | 6 | 640 |
| L1 cache | 192 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 1000 KB/core | n/a |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 58-72 Gpix/sec | 259 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 115-144 GTex/s | 518 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 3.7-4.6 TFLOPS | 16.6 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | IGP | Custom |
| TGP | 80 W | n/a |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Max temperature | n/a | 100 °C |
| Transistor count | n/a | 28 billion |
Memory
| Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 9600 MHz |
| Bus | n/a | 512 bit |
| ECC support | n/a | No |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12.1 | n/a |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | n/a |
| OpenGL | 3.2 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 1.4 | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
