Apple M4 GPU (10-Core) vs Intel Arc 3 A370M

Compared 2 processors: Apple M4 GPU (10-Core), vs Intel Arc 3 A370M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Apple M4 GPU (10-Core) and Intel Arc 3 A370M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
51
28
20
10
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
38
29
21
12
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
44
28
22
n/a
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
32
31
21
10
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
19
12
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
29
28
19
12
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
22
15
13
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
18
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
34
30
21
12
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a32
1080p Ultran/a24
1440p Ultran/a17
4K Ultran/a9
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)
3946
Intel Arc 3 A370M
2998
Time Spyn/a3439
Solar Bayn/a11861
Port Royaln/a386
Fire Striken/a7957
Night Raidn/a35616
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)
37678
Intel Arc 3 A370M
31544
Background Blur72.2 frames/s70.6 frames/s
Face Detection48.3 frames/s32.2 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.4 Gpix/sec0.47 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.94 Gpix/sec1.37 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.5 Gpix/sec2.15 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.53 Gpix/sec0.34 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching123.3 Gpix/sec138.8 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics4938.4 fps7194.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)
n/a
Intel Arc 3 A370M
5115
G2D Markn/a724
DirectX 11n/a29 fps
DirectX 12n/a24 fps
GPU Computen/a3014 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)
63.1 fps
Intel Arc 3 A370M
38.2 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)344.5 fps203.7 fps
Car Chase259.9 fps152 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)167.5 fps139.2 fps
T-Rex914.7 fps827.5 fps
ALU 2432.2 fps922 fps
Driver Overhead 2648.6 fps153.9 fps
APIMetalOpenGL
OSOS XWindows
Tessellationn/a1179

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Apple Intel
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced May, 7, 2024 March, 30, 2022
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Professional Universal
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture Apple M GPU Intel Xe-HPG
Codename Custom ACM-G11

GPU

GPU Frequency 500 MHz 1150-1550 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1800 MHz 1550-2050 MHz
Shader Units 1280 1024
TMUs 80 64
ROPs 40 32
Execution Units 160 128
Ray Tracing Cores n/a 8
L1 cache n/a 1536 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 4000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72 Gpix/sec 50-66 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 144 GTex/s 99-131 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.6 TFLOPS 3.2-4.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Custom PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 18 W 35-50 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 3 nm 6 nm
Max temperature 100 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 157 mm²
Transistor count 28 billion 7.2 billion
Transistor density n/a 45.86 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency 7500 MHz 1500 MHz
Bus 128 bit 64 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 15000 MB/s 12000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 4 GB
Max Throughput
Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)
120 GB/s
Intel Arc 3 A370M
96 GB/s

API

DirectX n/a 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL n/a 4.6
DisplayPort n/a 2.0
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below