Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core) vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070
38
out 100
VS
55
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core), vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 170 113 105 79 |
 The Witcher 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 191 160 114 61 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 262 207 148 82 |
 Far Cry 6 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 148 135 112 71 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 120 96 78 43 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 154 141 110 72 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 104 87 74 40 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 133 115 78 34 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 209 194 148 81 |
| 1080p High | n/a | 166 |
| 1080p Ultra | n/a | 139 |
| 1440p Ultra | n/a | 107 |
| 4K Ultra | n/a | 63 |
| Deviation | n/a | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | n/a | 17825 |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 82645 |
| Port Royal | n/a | 11149 |
| Fire Strike | n/a | 44109 |
| Night Raid | n/a | 152587 |
| Background Blur | 106 frames/s | 233 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 73.1 frames/s | 141.7 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 2.59 Gpix/sec | 6.62 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 3.8 Gpix/sec | 9.19 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 2.4 Gpix/sec | 9.2 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.73 Gpix/sec | 1.78 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 198.6 Gpix/sec | 845.4 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 8166.3 fps | 25043.9 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | n/a | 1165 |
| DirectX 11 | n/a | 245 fps |
| DirectX 12 | n/a | 102 fps |
| GPU Compute | n/a | 14820 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | n/a | 1039 fps |
| Car Chase | n/a | 900 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | n/a | 761.2 fps |
| T-Rex | n/a | 3848.1 fps |
| ALU 2 | n/a | 5980.8 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | n/a | 296.7 fps |
| API | n/a | OpenGL |
| OS | n/a | Windows |
| Tessellation | n/a | 6200.7 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Apple | Nvidia |
| Build | Integrated | Discrete |
| Announced | October, 29, 2024 | April, 13, 2023 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | PC use |
| Use case | Professional | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Apple M GPU | Ada Lovelace |
| Codename | Custom | AD104 |
| Price | n/a | 599 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 1920 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2475 MHz |
| Shader Units | 2048 | 5888 |
| TMUs | 128 | 184 |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| Execution Units | 256 | 46 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | n/a | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | n/a | 184 |
| L1 cache | n/a | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | n/a | 36000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 115 Gpix/sec | 158 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 230 GTex/s | 455 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 7.4 TFLOPS | 29.1 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | Custom | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 26 W | 200 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Max temperature | 100 °C | n/a |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 294 mm² |
| Transistor count | n/a | 35 billion |
| Transistor density | n/a | 119.05 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | System Shared | GDDR6X |
| Memory Frequency | 7500 MHz | 1313 MHz |
| Bus | 192 bit | 192 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 15000 MB/s | 21000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | n/a | 12 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | n/a | 12 |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | n/a | 4.6 |
| CUDA | n/a | 8.9 |
| DisplayPort | n/a | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | DLSS 3 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
