Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core) vs AMD Radeon 740M
38
out 100
VS
25
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core), vs AMD Radeon 740M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 30 13 13 n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 11 12 n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 29 18 13 n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 23 18 11 n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 13 n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 22 20 15 9 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 13 n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 11 9 n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 19 17 12 n/a |
| 1080p High | n/a | 19 |
| 1080p Ultra | n/a | 14 |
| 1440p Ultra | n/a | 10 |
| 4K Ultra | n/a | - |
| Deviation | n/a | High |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | n/a | 1645 |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 5823 |
| Port Royal | n/a | 722 |
| Fire Strike | n/a | 5118 |
| Night Raid | n/a | 21927 |
| Background Blur | 106 frames/s | 31.6 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 73.1 frames/s | 15.3 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 2.59 Gpix/sec | 0.44 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 3.8 Gpix/sec | 0.56 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 2.4 Gpix/sec | 0.47 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.73 Gpix/sec | 0.17 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 198.6 Gpix/sec | 47 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 8166.3 fps | 1815.3 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | n/a | 810 |
| DirectX 11 | n/a | 27 fps |
| DirectX 12 | n/a | 18 fps |
| GPU Compute | n/a | 1756 Ops/s |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Apple | AMD |
| Build | Integrated | Integrated |
| Announced | October, 29, 2024 | January, 4, 2023 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Professional | Universal |
| Segment | Mid-range | Entry-level |
| Architecture | Apple M GPU | RDNA 3.0 |
| Codename | Custom | Phoenix |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2500-2800 MHz |
| Shader Units | 2048 | 256 |
| TMUs | 128 | 16 |
| ROPs | 64 | 8 |
| Execution Units | 256 | 4 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | n/a | 4 |
| L1 cache | n/a | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | n/a | 2000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 115 Gpix/sec | 20-22 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 230 GTex/s | 40-45 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 7.4 TFLOPS | 1.3-1.4 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | Custom | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| TGP | 26 W | 15 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Max temperature | 100 °C | 95 °C |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 178 mm² |
| Transistor count | n/a | 25.4 billion |
| Transistor density | n/a | 142.7 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | 7500 MHz | n/a |
| Bus | 192 bit | n/a |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 15000 MB/s | n/a |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | n/a | 12 |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | n/a | 4.6 |
| DisplayPort | n/a | 2.1 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
