Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
20
out 100
VS
33
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 25 13 10 n/a | 85 49 41 24 |
 The Witcher 3 | 21 17 12 n/a | 81 67 47 24 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 41 20 19 n/a | 135 94 65 30 |
 Far Cry 6 | 26 26 18 9 | 70 61 45 21 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 17 11 10 n/a | 43 36 27 14 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 28 22 16 11 | 53 47 31 21 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 14 n/a n/a n/a | 41 32 23 13 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 12 n/a n/a n/a | 44 41 22 10 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24 21 14 n/a | 78 72 47 22 |
| 1080p High | 23 | 70 |
| 1080p Ultra | 16 | 55 |
| 1440p Ultra | 12 | 39 |
| 4K Ultra | - | 20 |
| Deviation | Medium | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 2092 | 5960 |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 25955 |
| Port Royal | n/a | 3328 |
| Fire Strike | 6521 | 15850 |
| Night Raid | 28088 | 62399 |
| Background Blur | 54.1 frames/s | 150.7 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 25.9 frames/s | 75.5 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 0.9 Gpix/sec | 2.83 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 1.31 Gpix/sec | 3.68 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 1.4 Gpix/sec | 4.08 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.2 Gpix/sec | 0.89 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 70.1 Gpix/sec | 257.7 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 2008.1 fps | 9069.6 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 292 | 540 |
| DirectX 11 | 35 fps | 96 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 19 fps | 39 fps |
| GPU Compute | 1813 Ops/s | 3992 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 166.7 fps | 326.8 fps |
| Car Chase | 150.1 fps | 290.3 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 134.4 fps | 264.8 fps |
| T-Rex | 643.6 fps | 1326.4 fps |
| ALU 2 | 622.1 fps | 1494.6 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 202.8 fps | 202.7 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 730.8 | 1656.1 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | January, 3, 2017 | January, 29, 2019 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | High-end |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Codename | GP107 (N17P-G0) | TU106 (N18E-G1-B) |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1354 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1493 MHz | 1175-1200 MHz |
| Shader Units | 640 | 1920 |
| TMUs | 40 | 120 |
| ROPs | 16 | 48 |
| Execution Units | 5 | 30 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | No | 30 |
| Tensor Cores | No | 240 |
| L1 cache | 48 KB/core | 64 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB/core | 3000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 24 Gpix/sec | 56-58 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 60 GTex/s | 141-144 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 1.9 TFLOPS | 4.5-4.6 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TGP | 55 W | 80-115 W |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Max temperature | 97 °C | n/a |
| Transistor Size | 132 mm² | 445 mm² |
| Transistor count | 3.3 billion | 10.8 billion |
| Transistor density | 25 MTr/mm² | 24.27 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Frequency | 1752 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Bus | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 7008 MB/s | 11000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 7.5 |
| DisplayPort | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Ray Tracing | No | Yes |
| DLSS | No | DLSS 2 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
