Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 560

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, vs AMD Radeon RX 560. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 560
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
33
15
15
n/a
34
17
15
n/a
The Witcher 3
22
20
14
n/a
15
15
9
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
46
29
23
n/a
33
19
15
n/a
Far Cry 6
30
28
20
9
28
19
13
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
18
13
11
n/a
13
11
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
30
26
16
11
26
22
17
9
Ghost of Tsushima
13
9
9
n/a
13
9
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
13
12
n/a
n/a
12
10
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
30
27
15
n/a
23
19
13
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High2622
1080p Ultra2016
1440p Ultra1411
4K Ultra--
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2312
AMD Radeon RX 560
1769
Time Spy23521857
Fire Strike77036495
Night Raid3345925510
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
21180
AMD Radeon RX 560
19139
Background Blur56.6 frames/s34 frames/s
Face Detection27.4 frames/s17.6 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.82 Gpix/sec0.69 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.2 Gpix/sec1.43 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.27 Gpix/sec1.15 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.18 Gpix/sec0.2 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching66.3 Gpix/sec65.5 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics1916.5 fps2232.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
6329
AMD Radeon RX 560
3657
G2D Mark649487
DirectX 1145 fps24 fps
DirectX 1225 fps20 fps
GPU Compute2657 Ops/s1449 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
34.4 fps
AMD Radeon RX 560
25.5 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)196 fps144.3 fps
Car Chase195.2 fpsn/a
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)166.6 fpsn/a
T-Rex839.6 fpsn/a
ALU 2744.9 fpsn/a
Driver Overhead 2270.3 fpsn/a
APIOpenGLVulkan
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation848.1n/a

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia AMD
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced October, 25, 2016 April, 18, 2017
Form Factor PC use PC use
Use case Gaming Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Pascal GCN 4.0
Codename GP107 Polaris 21
Price 139 99

GPU

GPU Frequency 1291 MHz 1175 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1392 MHz 1275 MHz
Shader Units 768 1024
TMUs 48 64
ROPs 32 16
Execution Units 6 n/a
Ray Tracing Cores No No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache 48 KB/core 16 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 45 Gpix/sec 20 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 67 GTex/s 82 GTex/s
FLOPS 2.1 TFLOPS 2.6 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
TGP 75 W 75 W
Process Samsung GlobalFoundries
Process tech. 14 nm 14 nm
Max temperature 97 °C n/a
Transistor Size 132 mm² 123 mm²
Transistor count 3 billion 3 billion
Transistor density 22.73 MTr/mm² 24.39 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory Frequency 1752 MHz 1750 MHz
Bus 128 bit 128 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 7000 MB/s 7000 MB/s
Memory Size 4 GB 4 GB
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
112.1 GB/s
AMD Radeon RX 560
112 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 6.1 n/a
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
1 (50%)
1 (50%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below