Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Apple M5 GPU (8-Core)
24
out 100
VS
n/a
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, vs Apple M5 GPU (8-Core). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 52 31 23 14 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 40 31 19 10 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 71 51 34 13 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 43 39 26 14 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 23 20 14 n/a | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 33 30 18 12 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 22 15 13 n/a | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 25 20 12 n/a | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 43 41 24 13 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
| 1080p High | 39 | n/a |
| 1080p Ultra | 31 | n/a |
| 1440p Ultra | 20 | n/a |
| 4K Ultra | 11 | n/a |
| Deviation | Low | n/a |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 3443 | n/a |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 19794 |
| Port Royal | 6905 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 9305 | n/a |
| Night Raid | 40408 | n/a |
| Background Blur | 74.4 frames/s | n/a |
| Face Detection | 42 frames/s | n/a |
| Horizon Detection | 1.47 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Edge Detection | 1.93 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Gaussian Blur | 1.81 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Feature Matching | 0.52 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Stereo Matching | 187 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Particle Physics | 5347.1 fps | n/a |
| API | OpenCL | n/a |
| G2D Mark | 384 | n/a |
| DirectX 11 | 50 fps | n/a |
| DirectX 12 | 27 fps | n/a |
| GPU Compute | 2750 Ops/s | n/a |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 251.1 fps | n/a |
| Car Chase | 240.5 fps | n/a |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 200.6 fps | n/a |
| T-Rex | 931.9 fps | n/a |
| ALU 2 | 1021.5 fps | n/a |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 270.6 fps | n/a |
| API | OpenGL | n/a |
| OS | Windows | n/a |
| Tessellation | 1151.2 | n/a |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Apple |
| Build | Discrete | Integrated |
| Announced | April, 15, 2020 | March, 3, 2026 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Professional |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Turing | Apple M GPU |
| Codename | TU117 | Custom |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1380 MHz | n/a |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1560 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Shader Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| Execution Units | 16 | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | No | n/a |
| Tensor Cores | No | n/a |
| L1 cache | 64 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB/core | n/a |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 50 Gpix/sec | 52 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 100 GTex/s | 104 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 3.2 TFLOPS | 3.3 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | Custom |
| TGP | 50 W | n/a |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Max temperature | n/a | 100 °C |
| Transistor Size | 200 mm² | n/a |
| Transistor count | 4.7 billion | 28 billion |
| Transistor density | 23.5 MTr/mm² | n/a |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | 1500 MHz | 9600 MHz |
| Bus | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 12000 MB/s | n/a |
| Memory Size | 4 GB | n/a |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | n/a |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | n/a |
| CUDA | 7.5 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 1.4 | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | No | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
