Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Intel Arc 3 A370M

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, vs Intel Arc 3 A370M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and Intel Arc 3 A370M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
56
31
27
14
51
28
20
10
The Witcher 3
43
37
24
11
38
29
21
12
Counter-Strike 2
77
53
37
14
44
28
22
n/a
Far Cry 6
45
40
26
15
32
31
21
10
Hogwarts Legacy
24
18
16
9
19
12
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
38
28
21
13
29
28
19
12
Ghost of Tsushima
26
15
15
n/a
22
15
13
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
25
24
14
n/a
20
18
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
50
46
26
14
34
30
21
12
Avg FPS
1080p High4332
1080p Ultra3224
1440p Ultra2317
4K Ultra119
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
3491
Intel Arc 3 A370M
2998
Time Spy36753439
Solar Bayn/a11861
Port Royaln/a386
Fire Strike100787957
Night Raid4227035616
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
47056
Intel Arc 3 A370M
31544
Background Blur83.5 frames/s70.6 frames/s
Face Detection45.7 frames/s32.2 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.77 Gpix/sec0.47 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection2.32 Gpix/sec1.37 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.28 Gpix/sec2.15 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.62 Gpix/sec0.34 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching204.1 Gpix/sec138.8 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics5954.3 fps7194.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
7537
Intel Arc 3 A370M
5115
G2D Mark381724
DirectX 1161 fps29 fps
DirectX 1233 fps24 fps
GPU Compute2733 Ops/s3014 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
n/a
Intel Arc 3 A370M
38.2 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a203.7 fps
Car Chasen/a152 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a139.2 fps
T-Rexn/a827.5 fps
ALU 2n/a922 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a153.9 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a1179

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia Intel
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced April, 2, 2020 March, 30, 2022
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Universal
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture Turing Intel Xe-HPG
Codename TU117 (N18P-G62) ACM-G11

GPU

GPU Frequency 1350 MHz 1150-1550 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1485 MHz 1550-2050 MHz
Shader Units 1024 1024
TMUs 64 64
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 16 128
Ray Tracing Cores No 8
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache 64 KB/core 1536 KB/core
L2 cache 1000 KB/core 4000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 48 Gpix/sec 50-66 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 95 GTex/s 99-131 GTex/s
FLOPS 3 TFLOPS 3.2-4.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 50 W 35-50 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 12 nm 6 nm
Transistor Size 200 mm² 157 mm²
Transistor count 4.7 billion 7.2 billion
Transistor density 23.5 MTr/mm² 45.86 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Frequency 1500 MHz 1500 MHz
Bus 128 bit 64 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 12000 MB/s 12000 MB/s
Memory Size 4 GB 4 GB
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
192 GB/s
Intel Arc 3 A370M
96 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 7.5 n/a
DisplayPort 1.4 2.0
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below