Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon 780M

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, vs AMD Radeon 780M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and AMD Radeon 780M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
83
49
39
22
51
26
22
12
The Witcher 3
74
59
41
21
29
25
13
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
125
89
63
27
46
27
19
n/a
Far Cry 6
69
60
42
21
39
31
19
10
Hogwarts Legacy
43
34
24
12
20
15
11
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
49
41
30
21
35
29
20
12
Ghost of Tsushima
38
28
21
12
20
16
10
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
40
38
20
10
20
19
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
73
66
46
21
35
31
18
9
Avg FPS
1080p High6633
1080p Ultra5224
1440p Ultra3616
4K Ultra19-
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5320
AMD Radeon 780M
2675
Time Spy55972781
Solar Bay1795011162
Port Royal15071580
Fire Strike148327824
Night Raid6055933611
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
67761
AMD Radeon 780M
32713
Background Blur119.1 frames/s86.4 frames/s
Face Detection64.8 frames/s35.8 frames/s
Horizon Detection2.58 Gpix/sec1.03 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection3.28 Gpix/sec1.36 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur3.37 Gpix/sec1.41 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.88 Gpix/sec0.41 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching300.1 Gpix/sec132.4 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics8599.6 fps4470.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
10161
AMD Radeon 780M
7001
G2D Mark477878
DirectX 1187 fps67 fps
DirectX 1239 fps31 fps
GPU Compute3717 Ops/s3719 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
54.4 fps
AMD Radeon 780M
34.6 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)310 fps183.4 fps
Car Chase289.4 fps202.9 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)257.9 fps161.6 fps
T-Rex1225.1 fps699.9 fps
ALU 21359 fps849.2 fps
Driver Overhead 2199 fps268.9 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1509.11373.8

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia AMD
Build Discrete Integrated
Announced April, 23, 2019 January, 4, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Universal
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Turing RDNA 3.0
Codename TU116 (N18E-G0) Phoenix

GPU

GPU Frequency 1455 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1590 MHz 2700-2800 MHz
Shader Units 1536 768
TMUs 96 48
ROPs 48 32
Execution Units 24 12
Ray Tracing Cores No 12
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache 64 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 1536 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 76 Gpix/sec 86-90 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 153 GTex/s 130-134 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.9 TFLOPS 4.1-4.3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 80 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 12 nm 4 nm
Transistor Size 284 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count 6.6 billion 25.4 billion
Transistor density 23.24 MTr/mm² 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6 System Shared
Memory Frequency 1500 MHz n/a
Bus 192 bit n/a
ECC support No n/a
Effective Memory Speed 12000 MB/s n/a
Memory Size 6 GB n/a
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
288 GB/s
AMD Radeon 780M
n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 7.5 n/a
DisplayPort 1.4 2.1
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
3 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 3

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below