Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon 780M

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, vs AMD Radeon 780M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon 780M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
91
52
43
25
51
26
22
12
The Witcher 3
87
70
47
26
29
25
13
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
138
98
71
31
46
27
19
n/a
Far Cry 6
75
66
47
24
39
31
19
10
Hogwarts Legacy
49
37
27
13
20
15
11
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
56
49
33
23
35
29
20
12
Ghost of Tsushima
45
34
25
13
20
16
10
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
47
45
25
12
20
19
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
80
74
49
27
35
31
18
9
Avg FPS
1080p High7433
1080p Ultra5824
1440p Ultra4116
4K Ultra22-
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
5918
AMD Radeon 780M
2675
Time Spy63442781
Solar Bay2046211162
Port Royal16521580
Fire Strike166437824
Night Raid7611633611
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
72340
AMD Radeon 780M
32713
Background Blur124.8 frames/s86.4 frames/s
Face Detection69.4 frames/s35.8 frames/s
Horizon Detection2.67 Gpix/sec1.03 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection3.48 Gpix/sec1.36 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur3.52 Gpix/sec1.41 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.92 Gpix/sec0.41 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching355.9 Gpix/sec132.4 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics9094.4 fps4470.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
12901
AMD Radeon 780M
7001
G2D Mark807878
DirectX 11103 fps67 fps
DirectX 1251 fps31 fps
GPU Compute5253 Ops/s3719 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
71.9 fps
AMD Radeon 780M
34.6 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)404.9 fps183.4 fps
Car Chase369.2 fps202.9 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)324.3 fps161.6 fps
T-Rex1580.9 fps699.9 fps
ALU 21754.8 fps849.2 fps
Driver Overhead 2257.4 fps268.9 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1901.61373.8

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia AMD
Build Discrete Integrated
Announced February, 22, 2019 January, 4, 2023
Form Factor PC use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Universal
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Turing RDNA 3.0
Codename TU116 Phoenix
Price 279 n/a

GPU

GPU Frequency 1500 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1770 MHz 2700-2800 MHz
Shader Units 1536 768
TMUs 96 48
ROPs 48 32
Execution Units 24 12
Ray Tracing Cores No 12
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache 64 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 1536 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 85 Gpix/sec 86-90 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 170 GTex/s 130-134 GTex/s
FLOPS 5.4 TFLOPS 4.1-4.3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 120 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 12 nm 4 nm
Transistor Size 284 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count 6 billion 25.4 billion
Transistor density 21.13 MTr/mm² 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6 System Shared
Memory Frequency 1500 MHz n/a
Bus 192 bit n/a
ECC support No n/a
Effective Memory Speed 12000 MB/s n/a
Memory Size 6 GB n/a
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
288 GB/s
AMD Radeon 780M
n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 7.5 n/a
DisplayPort 1.4a 2.1
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below