Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs AMD Radeon 780M
41
out 100
VS
27
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, vs AMD Radeon 780M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 120 75 68 45 | 51 26 22 12 |
 The Witcher 3 | 139 110 78 41 | 29 25 13 n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 196 151 107 53 | 46 27 19 n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 105 92 73 41 | 39 31 19 10 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 73 62 43 22 | 20 15 11 n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 91 84 58 38 | 35 29 20 12 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 70 58 44 22 | 20 16 10 n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 79 72 45 18 | 20 19 11 n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 125 112 80 41 | 35 31 18 9 |
| 1080p High | 111 | 33 |
| 1080p Ultra | 91 | 24 |
| 1440p Ultra | 66 | 16 |
| 4K Ultra | 36 | - |
| Deviation | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 10170 | 2781 |
| Solar Bay | 45958 | 11162 |
| Port Royal | 6033 | 1580 |
| Fire Strike | 25661 | 7824 |
| Night Raid | 102512 | 33611 |
| Background Blur | 166.7 frames/s | 86.4 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 103.3 frames/s | 35.8 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 4.21 Gpix/sec | 1.03 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 5.56 Gpix/sec | 1.36 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 5.58 Gpix/sec | 1.41 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.17 Gpix/sec | 0.41 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 489.7 Gpix/sec | 132.4 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 13242.9 fps | 4470.7 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 878 | 878 |
| DirectX 11 | 150 fps | 67 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 67 fps | 31 fps |
| GPU Compute | 7619 Ops/s | 3719 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 575 fps | 183.4 fps |
| Car Chase | 513.3 fps | 202.9 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 473.3 fps | 161.6 fps |
| T-Rex | 2543.8 fps | 699.9 fps |
| ALU 2 | 2749.6 fps | 849.2 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 284.1 fps | 268.9 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 2924.7 | 1373.8 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | AMD |
| Build | Discrete | Integrated |
| Announced | July, 9, 2019 | January, 4, 2023 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Universal |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Codename | TU104 | Phoenix |
| Price | 499 | n/a |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1605 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1770 MHz | 2700-2800 MHz |
| Shader Units | 2560 | 768 |
| TMUs | 160 | 48 |
| ROPs | 64 | 32 |
| Execution Units | 40 | 12 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 12 |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | n/a |
| L1 cache | 64 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 4000 KB/core | 2000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 113 Gpix/sec | 86-90 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 283 GTex/s | 130-134 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 9.1 TFLOPS | 4.1-4.3 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| TGP | 215 W | 15 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor Size | 545 mm² | 178 mm² |
| Transistor count | 13 billion | 25.4 billion |
| Transistor density | 23.85 MTr/mm² | 142.7 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | 1750 MHz | n/a |
| Bus | 256 bit | n/a |
| ECC support | No | n/a |
| Effective Memory Speed | 14000 MB/s | n/a |
| Memory Size | 8 GB | n/a |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | 2.1 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 2 | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
