Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop vs Apple M5 GPU (8-Core)

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop, vs Apple M5 GPU (8-Core). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop and Apple M5 GPU (8-Core)
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
106
65
53
35
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
The Witcher 3
115
92
65
34
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
167
123
90
42
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Far Cry 6
86
80
61
33
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
63
53
35
18
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
75
65
45
32
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Ghost of Tsushima
60
47
33
20
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
64
56
34
15
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
98
89
62
33
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High93n/a
1080p Ultra74n/a
1440p Ultra53n/a
4K Ultra29n/a
DeviationLown/a

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
7959
Apple M5 GPU (8-Core)
4481
Time Spy8211n/a
Solar Bay3556319794
Port Royal4627n/a
Fire Strike21866n/a
Night Raid84235n/a
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
81436
Apple M5 GPU (8-Core)
n/a
Background Blur141.4 frames/sn/a
Face Detection84.1 frames/sn/a
Horizon Detection3.07 Gpix/secn/a
Edge Detection3.91 Gpix/secn/a
Gaussian Blur3.85 Gpix/secn/a
Feature Matching1.1 Gpix/secn/a
Stereo Matching325.9 Gpix/secn/a
Particle Physics11008.8 fpsn/a
APIOpenCLn/a
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
14434
Apple M5 GPU (8-Core)
n/a
G2D Mark630n/a
DirectX 11130 fpsn/a
DirectX 1261 fpsn/a
GPU Compute5961 Ops/sn/a
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
99.7 fps
Apple M5 GPU (8-Core)
n/a
Aztec Ruins (Normal)597.7 fpsn/a
Car Chase531.2 fpsn/a
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)416.7 fpsn/a
T-Rex2221.6 fpsn/a
ALU 22915 fpsn/a
Driver Overhead 2258.8 fpsn/a
APIOpenGLn/a
OSWindowsn/a
Tessellation2946.5n/a

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia Apple
Build Discrete Integrated
Announced February, 22, 2023 March, 3, 2026
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Professional
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Ada Lovelace Apple M GPU
Codename AD107 (GN21-X2) Custom

GPU

GPU Frequency 1140-2070 MHz n/a
Boost GPU Frequency 1605-2370 MHz 1620 MHz
Shader Units 2560 1024
TMUs 80 64
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 20 128
Ray Tracing Cores 20 n/a
Tensor Cores 80 n/a
L1 cache 128 KB/core n/a
L2 cache 12000 KB/core n/a
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 51-76 Gpix/sec 52 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 128-190 GTex/s 104 GTex/s
FLOPS 8.2-12.1 TFLOPS 3.3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 Custom
TGP 35-140 W n/a
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 5 nm 3 nm
Max temperature n/a 100 °C
Transistor Size 156 mm² n/a
Transistor count 18.9 billion 28 billion
Transistor density 121.15 MTr/mm² n/a

Memory

Interface GDDR6 System Shared
Memory Frequency 2000 MHz 9600 MHz
Bus 96 bit 128 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 16000 MB/s n/a
Memory Size 6 GB n/a
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
192 GB/s
Apple M5 GPU (8-Core)
153 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 n/a
Vulkan 1.3 n/a
OpenGL 4.6 n/a
CUDA 8.9 n/a
DisplayPort 1.4a n/a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 3 No

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below