Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Apple A18 Pro GPU
44
out 100
VS
28
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, vs Apple A18 Pro GPU. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 146 94 84 60 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 172 142 100 54 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 239 194 133 77 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 129 118 95 56 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 95 81 62 31 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 122 110 82 53 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 88 73 55 33 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 104 93 56 29 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 157 149 110 60 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
| 1080p High | 139 | n/a |
| 1080p Ultra | 117 | n/a |
| 1440p Ultra | 86 | n/a |
| 4K Ultra | 50 | n/a |
| Deviation | Low | n/a |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 13469 | n/a |
| Solar Bay | 62160 | 7273 |
| Port Royal | 8112 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 34295 | n/a |
| Night Raid | 137720 | n/a |
| Background Blur | 232.6 frames/s | n/a |
| Face Detection | 138.4 frames/s | n/a |
| Horizon Detection | 4.68 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Edge Detection | 6.06 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Gaussian Blur | 6.99 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Feature Matching | 1.6 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Stereo Matching | 652.6 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Particle Physics | 19534.7 fps | n/a |
| API | OpenCL | n/a |
| G2D Mark | 1067 | n/a |
| DirectX 11 | 201 fps | n/a |
| DirectX 12 | 90 fps | n/a |
| GPU Compute | 12216 Ops/s | n/a |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 725.1 fps | n/a |
| Car Chase | 609.6 fps | n/a |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 484.8 fps | n/a |
| T-Rex | 2723.3 fps | n/a |
| ALU 2 | 3299.3 fps | n/a |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 272.9 fps | n/a |
| API | OpenGL | n/a |
| OS | Windows | n/a |
| Tessellation | 3381.9 | n/a |
| Image Classification (SP) | n/a | 3264 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | n/a | 4550 |
| Horizon Detection | n/a | 6705 |
| Face Detection (HP) | n/a | 11770 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | n/a | 15548 |
| Text Classification (SP) | n/a | 3678 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | n/a | 5678 |
| Object Detection (SP) | n/a | 3360 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | n/a | 13468 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | n/a | 31541 |
| Framework | n/a | Core ML |
| Backend | n/a | GPU |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Apple |
| Build | Discrete | Integrated |
| Announced | July, 18, 2023 | September, 9, 2024 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Universal |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Apple M GPU |
| Codename | AD106 | Custom |
| Price | 499 | n/a |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 2310 MHz | n/a |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2535 MHz | 1490 MHz |
| Shader Units | 4352 | 768 |
| TMUs | 136 | 40 |
| ROPs | 48 | n/a |
| Execution Units | 34 | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | n/a |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | n/a |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 32000 KB/core | n/a |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 122 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Texture Fill Rate | 345 GTex/s | 60 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 22.1 TFLOPS | 2.3 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Custom |
| TGP | 165 W | n/a |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Transistor Size | 188 mm² | n/a |
| Transistor count | 22 billion | n/a |
| Transistor density | 117.02 MTr/mm² | n/a |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | 2250 MHz | 7500 MHz |
| Bus | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 18000 MB/s | n/a |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | n/a |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | n/a |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | n/a |
| CUDA | 8.9 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 3 | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
